Skip to main content

Wanipigow Sand Extraction Project - construction proceeding before environmental license is provided

On Monday March 11, I asked in Question Period about the development of the Silica Sand Mine near Hollow Water First Nation.  We have heard from several sources that construction is proceeding at the mine site even though the environmental review and the indigenous consultations have not been completed.  

Development of Silica Sand Mine - Health and Environmental Concerns

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights):
      There are issues which need to be addressed with the Wanipigow sand extraction project. The government's own departments' comments on the proposal put forward by Canadian Premium Sands say there are very concerning health issues related to air quality, as silica dust is well known to cause adverse health effects, including acute and chronic silicosis. There are also concerns about groundwater impact, of the handling of tailings and about the lack of a remediation plan when the mine closes.
      When will these critical issues be addressed?

Hon. Blaine Pedersen (Minister of Growth, Enterprise and Trade): Well, Madam Speaker, I've got a really good MP, so there's no need for me to run federally.
      In regards to Canadian Premium Sand and their application, it's getting an envi­ronmental review or having an environmental review done right now. Section 35 consultations are going on.
      But I really wonder why this–when Canadian Premium Sand first brought their proposal forward, they said they could hire 150 local people. To date, they've got 250 applications in.
      Why is this member against local economic development?

Madam Speaker: The honourable member for River Heights, on a final supplementary.

Mineral and Timber Extraction - Environmental Oversight

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, the forestry and peatlands branch of Manitoba's Sustainable Development Department says any further development requiring timber removal (which apparently is ongoing) that is beyond the exploration that has already occurred should be put on hold until an environmental act licence and indigenous consultation are completed and approved.
      In 2013, under the NDP, a whole mine was built before the environmental licence was issued. Is the Pallister government now joining the NDP in his approach? Is the Pallister government going to be as bad at handling environmental issues as the NDP was?

Hon. Rochelle Squires (Minister of Sustainable Development): Well, thank you very much, Madam Speaker. I'm going to try to explain the process for the member's benefit, but, unfortunately, I cannot make him understand the process. So let's walk through this.
      The company comes to us and they apply for a licence. And that is what we're doing. During this process, we hear from a lot of user groups of the resources, including folks in my own department, and we hear their feedback and we work through all the issues before issuing a licence for the company to operate.
      We are also doing this in conjunction with a section 35 consultation that is occurring. And those things have to have to happen before the licence is issued.
      We're following the process and we're working towards environmental sustainability as these projects move forward. [But for the process to have any credibility, construction should not be occurring before the permit is issued.  The way the Pallister government is proceeding is a problem in that it is letting construction occur before the environmental review and indigenous consultations are completed.]


  1. I'm here to appreciate doctor chala for helping me for The cure which really work for me God will always continue to bless you more abundantly, for the good works you did in my life, I will always keep on writing good and posting my testimonies about you on the Internet, I was tested positive,I lost hope and I wept all day, contact Dr chala today and share your problems with him on his email address or visit his website on on


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that pre