Skip to main content

Pallister government is trying to use a budget bill to prevent his government from being sued over its poor handling of services for children

On September 16, we raised concerns about clauses in a budget bill which will prevent his government from being sued for their poor handling of  services for children.    Our full press release is below. 

PCs Must Remove Measures that Undermine Vulnerable Children from Budget

TREATY 1 TERRITORY,  WINNIPEG, MB - Grand Chief Jerry Daniels of the Southern Chiefs’ Organization (SCO) and Dougald Lamont, Manitoba Liberal Leader and MLA for St. Boniface, say the PCs must withdraw two measures from the budget that are designed to shield the Manitoba Government from being held responsible for the mistreatment of children in care. 

The PCs have introduced two “get out of jail free” clauses in their budget bill that deny people who have been wronged by the Manitoba Government for suing for compensation  with both cases involving vulnerable children in the care of Child and Family Services (CFS). 

Unlike other bills, budget bills don’t go before committees for public hearings. 

One budget measure seeks to shield the Provincial Government from being held responsible for clawing back tens of millions of dollars in benefits intended for children in care. The Manitoba Government is currently being sued by former wards of CFS to get their money back. If the budget passes, the lawsuit will effectively end and the PC Government will keep the money.

As the number of children in care rose to over 10,000 during the 2000’s scoop, the Manitoba Government diverted more and more children’s allowances into general revenue. Between 1999 and 2016, the NDP government diverted approximately $250-million. Since 2016, the PCs have diverted over $100-million.

In February, 2019, the Manitoba Government ordered the eviction of children’s home where high-risk, high-needs children were being cared for. The home, at 800 Adele, was in regular use and had special suites and security features to keep the children secure. 

Without consultation or warning, children in care were ousted from their beds and evicted in the middle of the night. The Pallister PCs then introduced a law with just two purposes: to cancel the lease between the Southern Authority and a private landlord, and stop anyone from suing the government for doing it.

“Our children’s resources are being stolen and Pallister is wanting to legislate himself out of being accountable for it. If the Pallister Government believes they’re right in taking the children’s money, why does he not want the courts to decide?” said Grand Chief Jerry Daniels. “In addition to this, the Pallister Government orchestrated a midnight move claiming there is no need for children to be given a home here. This was politically motivated because the public knows for a fact when it comes to creating safe homes for our children, there is a great need.”

 “The Pallister PCs are using a budget bill to do an end-run around the courts,” said Manitoba Liberal Leader Dougald Lamont. “The law is there to hold people to their word, and these measures set a terrible precedentthat the Premier gets to pick and choose who the law applies to, which contracts are valid, and whether wrongdoing will be held to account. These measures must be stripped from the budget bill.” 


Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba (red line) started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota (blue line)has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph!

Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Why was Skinner's restaurant removed from the Forks Market when there so much empty space there?

Wednesday, December 4 I asked in Question Period about the large amount of vacant space at the Forks Market, some of which had been vacant for two or more years.  I also asked specifically as to why the renowned Skinner's Restaurant was removed from the Forks Market when there is so much empty space now.  My question and the Minister's response are below.    A video of the exchange can be seen at this link - Forks Market - Vacancy Management
Hon. Jon Gerrard  (River Heights):Madam Speaker, today The Forks Market has a lot of empty space, much of it empty for two or more years. The list of vacant space includes what was formerly Muddy Waters smokehouse, Beachcombers, Skinners, Dragon House, Aida Crystal, significant parts of Sydney's, Sushi Train, and several balcony businesses a lot–along with a lot of unused former administrative space.       The minister overseeing municipal affairs is responsible for oversight of The Forks, a provincial tre…

An awful and uncaring Pallister government goes after the most vulnerable children in our province

Like a sleuth in the night, the Pallister government is cunningly using a bill, bill 34, [updated this is now (Oct 2020) Bill 2] called the Budget Implementation and Tax Statutes Amendment Act 2020, to prevent the return of millions of dollars which was taken away from children in the care of the government. 

The monies in question are called the "Children's Special Allowances" or the "federal special allowances for children".  In brief, under Jean Chretien and Paul Martin,  a Canada Child Benefit was established to help support children.  For children in the care of child and family services, where the parents are not directly looking after the children the money is paid to the agencies to help support the children.  There was a time when these monies were being used effectively by child welfare agencies to support children.   Some agencies used these funds in part to provide services to help the children they were looking after and in part into a trust fund …