Skip to main content

Changes to management of Crown land being imposed by the Pallister government will have adverse effects on many beef producers and on local communities


Dougald Lamont and I met with a concerned group of ranchers in Crane River on October 13th.   The ranchers felt betrayed by the actions of the Pallister government which is making changes to the management of Crown Lands in a way that is very detrimental to their own livelihood and to the future of their ability to raise cattle in the area near Crane River and in nearby areas near St. Rose du Lac and in the Interlake.   The ranchers were supported by a representative from the Manitoba Beef Producers, Diane Riding. 

The ranchers made a strong case for continuing the “unit transfer” system.   Under this system, which has existed for some time, beef producers are allowed to transfer the rights to the land and to sell the rights to lease and use the Crown land.  In the system, beef producers are rewarded when they make improvements to the land.  Under this system beef producers can build up equity in their operations and then when they retire, they can sell the rights to lease the land as a unit so that they will have a “pension” for when they retire.   The producers are very skeptical of what the government is proposing which is that producers would negotiate compensation for improvements to the individual or company which wins the rights to use the land at auction.  We talked to producers who have put hundreds of thousands of dollars in improvements to the land they have leased.  These include improvements like fences and dugouts.   It is pretty hard to take such improvements with you when your lease expires, and the producers felt the only way to be assured that they would get the money invested back was to be able to continue the unit transfer.   Not having the unit transfer would make it less likely that ranchers would invest in improvements to the land, or would be good environmental stewards of the land.   It is also to be noted that some producers in this area were specifically told at some point that they were not allowed to buy the land itself, so that a number of producers have leased Crown Land as the majority of the land that they graze their cattle on.    The producers are fine with the auction system being used for unused land, and land which has reverted to the Crown, but feel strongly that land which is actively being used by producers should keep the unit transfer system.

A second major concern was the increased costs of the lease by about 350% over the next two years.   This is a very rapid increase, particularly for producers with marginal land who have had to face both drought and flood conditions in the last few years.   This increase would put a number of the long term producers out of business.  It was noted that for some producers the marginal nature of the land was such that 90% is swamp.  Another said his land had more cattails than hay.  This is not the same as high quality Crown Land available elsewhere.   For a number of the producers, they were sacrificed in 2011 when these areas were flooded to save Winnipeg, and in one year since then.   They feel they are now being sacrificed again and that this time it will have a severe adverse impact on their local community.  They have put their heart and soul into investing in the land and in their community and they are disappointed, angry and frustrated by the actions of the Pallister government. Diane Riding of the Manitoba Beef Producers was very supportive of these ranchers and she said a lot of the input from the Manitoba Beef Producers was not adequately listened to by the government when it made its decision to change the system.

We also heard from a number of ranchers who had come from elsewhere because they saw Manitoba as a land of opportunity.   They now feel the opportunity is being lost and their future is being taken away.   We also heard that, contrary to the claims of the Pallister government, the changes being imposed on them will make it considerably more difficult for young ranchers to enter the system and begin raising cattle. 

We listened carefully to what we heard and we have decided to support the ranchers in our efforts in the Legislature, and to ensure people elsewhere in Manitoba have a better understanding of the implications of the Pallister government’s policies on people and on communities.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Manitoba Liberal accomplishments

  Examples of Manitoba Liberal accomplishments in the last three years Ensured that 2,000 Manitoba fishers were able to earn a living in 2020   (To see the full story click on this link ). Introduced a bill that includes retired teachers on the Pension Investment Board which governs their pension investments. Introduced amendments to ensure school aged children are included in childcare and early childhood education plans moving forward. Called for improvements in the management of the COVID pandemic: ·          We called for attention to personal care homes even before there was a single case in a personal care home. ·            We called for a rapid response team to address outbreaks in personal care homes months before the PCs acted.  ·          We called for a science-based approach to preparing schools to   improve ventilation and humidity long before the PCs acted. Helped hundreds of individuals with issues during the pandemic including those on social assistance

The Indigenous Science Conference in Winnipeg June 14-16

  June 14 to 16, I spent three days at the Turtle Island Indigenous Science Conference.  It was very worthwhile.   Speaker after speaker talked of the benefits of using both western or mainstream science and Indigenous science.  There is much we can learn from both approaches.   With me above is Myrle Ballard, one of the principal organizers of the conference.  Myrle Ballard, from Lake St. Martin in Manitoba, worked closely with Roger Dube a professor emeritus at Rochester Institute of Technology, and many others to make this conference, the first of its kind, a success.  As Roger Dube, Mohawk and Abenaki, a physicist, commented "My feeling is that the fusion of traditional ecological knowledge and Western science methodology should rapidly lead the researchers to much more holistic solutions to problems."   Dr. Myrle Ballard was the first person from her community to get a PhD.  She is currently a professor at the University of Manitoba and the Director of Indigenous Science