Skip to main content

Government policy on birth alerts

On October 8 in Families Estimates for the Department of Families, I asked about the government's policy to continue issuing birth alerts.  Birth Alerts are used by Child and Family Services with regard to families where CFHIsS workers believe that children need to be taken away from their parents.  Historically, Manitoba CFS has apprehended far more children than other comparable jurisdictions, and in recent years has been apprehending about a child a day at birth. 
Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): My question deals with birth alerts, and I understand the minister has indicated that there will be continued issuing of birth alert.
      There has, in the last few years, been a series of studies showing the tremendous adverse impact of taking children away from mothers: harm to the mother's health, including increased risk of suicides, and there is also potential significant deleterious effect on the impact of the child.
      So I am looking for an update on the status of that and what the minister is planning.
Mrs. Stefanson: So I want to thank the member for the question. And, certainly, the safety and security of infants, children and youth is our government's top priority. Sometimes families face challenges that might leave a newborn vulnerable, and we need to ensure that children are 'safed' for first and foremost. So we have been working with the CFS authorities to limit birth alerts to situations only where there is a high risk of harm to an infant, and we remain committed to that shared goal.
We do recognize, of course, that this came out of the MMIWG inquiry as well as our own Legislative Review Committee as well. And we know that BC is moving in a certain direction, and we're having a very close look at this, but we do know that, certainly, birth alerts are–the number of–that birth alerts themselves are down and–but we, first and foremost, we need to ensure the safety of those children. So that will remain to be our top priority.
      We're also taking other preventative measures as well. We've introduced our new social impact bond, which is working with doulas working with expectant moms closely to develop birth plans and–moving forward. And so we're looking forward to moving that forward as well.
      We want to, obviously, look at ways to prevent the apprehension of children in cases where we can. We don't want to have apprehensions where they're not needed, but we will–we have to look with that safety lens first, and so we'll continue to work with the authorities and agencies towards that goal.
Mr. Gerrard: Yes, I would be interested if the minister could share the statistics showing the number of birth alerts and how that they are actually going down.
      I'm quite concerned about this for a number of reasons. I remember a young woman who had her child taken away at birth. She was breastfeeding. The child was grabbed and taken away on day 4. She was doing well. There was no good reason for taking the child away, as was proved in court some six or eight weeks later.
And what do we want to make sure is that you have a good opportunity for mothers and children to do well, and, you know, this practice of, you know, preventing mothers from breastfeeding, who have been–and developing some of the attachment that is so critical to early childhood development, and I think that the–what I'm concerned about is that we really have strong, valid measures being used in terms of the risks of children and that in this case, the agency concerned had adequate opportunity to make a thorough and careful assessment before the child was born, and they failed to do that. And they were nervous, as a result of not having made that assessment, and they went ahead and issued a birth alert and took the child away.
      So I think that we need to make sure that the agencies are involved and make–taking preventive measures, looking carefully at and developing plans with mothers.
      So I would ask what preventive measures are being taken and what–so that mothers can be supported properly and so that you decrease the chance of children having to be taken away.
Mrs. Stefanson: I thank the member for the question and we do take prevention initiatives very, very seriously, and we've been–I did mention in my previous answer about our social impact bond, called Restoring the Sacred Bond doula project. So we'll keep working to protect vulnerable newborns and support families through initiatives like that.
      I think it's also important that part of our prevention work also includes partnerships with community-based organizations, like the Indigenous Women's Healing Centre, Villa Rosa, Families First and insight mentorship program to support pregnant women and new parents.
      So the prevention side is–we take it very seriously. We will obviously want to reduce the apprehensions, where possible and so those are some of the initiatives that we have ongoing on the prevention side.


Popular posts from this blog

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below: Personal-Care-Home Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and TrainingHon. Jon Gerrard  (River Heights):Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditions. I ask on…

Why was Skinner's restaurant removed from the Forks Market when there so much empty space there?

Wednesday, December 4 I asked in Question Period about the large amount of vacant space at the Forks Market, some of which had been vacant for two or more years.  I also asked specifically as to why the renowned Skinner's Restaurant was removed from the Forks Market when there is so much empty space now.  My question and the Minister's response are below.    A video of the exchange can be seen at this link - Forks Market - Vacancy Management
Hon. Jon Gerrard  (River Heights):Madam Speaker, today The Forks Market has a lot of empty space, much of it empty for two or more years. The list of vacant space includes what was formerly Muddy Waters smokehouse, Beachcombers, Skinners, Dragon House, Aida Crystal, significant parts of Sydney's, Sushi Train, and several balcony businesses a lot–along with a lot of unused former administrative space.       The minister overseeing municipal affairs is responsible for oversight of The Forks, a provincial tre…

Under the Pallister government there are fewer opportunities for youth and an increasing net movement of people away from Manitoba to other provinces

Under the Conservative Pallister government we are seeing an increasing movement of people away from Manitoba to other provinces.   Under the last year of the NDP the situation was not good with a net loss of people from Manitoba to other provinces of 4,921 people.   Under the Pallister Conservatives the net loss of people has gone up substantially to 9,246 - an increase in the net movement out of Manitoba to other provinces of 87%.    This is likely because the Pallister Conservative government's policies have made Manitoba a less desirable place to live so we have a larger movement of people away from Manitoba.

I am very concerned about the bad government we have under Mr. Pallister which is leading to this outcome. 

In a committee meeting on Poverty on Thursday evening December 5th,  I asked Minister Stefanson about a disturbing statistic in the government's Poverty report - that there has been a substantial increase in the number of youth aged 15 to 24 who are not in emp…