Skip to main content

Manitoba Liberals call for immediate action on Meth crisis

Manitoba Liberals are calling for immediate action by the Pallister Government, and the Health Minister in particular, to deal with what is a genuine crisis in methamphetamine addiction that is killing Manitobans, putting people on the frontline at risk, and tearing apart families who are pushed to the breaking point trying to find help for their loved ones. 
 
In the past month, we have heard from people across Manitoba that there is a meth crisis in their community, and that there are not enough provincial resources to deal with it.
 
We heard it from the mother of an addict in Brandon, who told us it is a problem in rural and northern Manitoba, and that it’s impossible to access care. We heard it at the Main Street Project. We hear it from homelessness advocates and health professionals, who say they are seeing people from all walks of life who have lost everything because of their crystal meth addiction.
 
The Pallister government is doing virtually nothing to deal with a problem that is very serious and needs attention now.
 
Windy Sinclair recently froze to death after she left a hospital where she was to be treated for her meth addiction. She was one of many Manitobans struggling with a brutal addiction to a drug that is toxic, cheap, and leads to psychosis in its users, which makes them a danger to themselves and others.
 
What is needed is a safe place for them to go. But virtually no such places exist. Neither the Main Street Project nor hospitals will take them, and Manitoba’s treatment programs are geared toward alcohol detox and 12-step programs – not meth.
 
The need is clear.
 
Manitoba needs an effective plan, to take people from addiction through recovery. When Liberal MLA Dr Jon Gerrard raised these issues with the Pallister government in the last legislative session, his questions were evaded or ignored. (Question Period - October 27, 2017 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwN5JQUWims&feature=youtu.be)
 
We are not going to wait for the Pallister government to develop a plan. This is what is needed:
 
Step 1: There is an urgent need for “Drug Stabilization Units” – spaces where people in meth withdrawal can be held safely. There is a need for about 40 spaces in Winnipeg. These involve a safe place and a private room with locks where people can be assessed, and a treatment plan developed. Patients would stay for 15-30 days. Police or Paramedics could take people straight there.
 
Step 2: There is a need for funding transitional housing with mental health supports in-house – a psychiatrist or psychologist, mental health workers and/or a psychiatric nurse who can monitor and administer medication for up to 4 months. Morberg House in St. Boniface is providing these services.  However, additional capacity along the lines of what is delivered at Morberg House, is needed.
 
Step 3: People in recovery can move to their own housing with less intensive support for up to two years.
 
In addition, we need the Province to provide adequate supports so that people seeking treatment can get the care they need when they need it. This can be as simple as funding a psychiatric nurse or nurse practitioner at sites like the Main Street Project.
 
There must also be investments in prevention, including public awareness programs to warn Manitobans about the dangers of meth use. While the focus has been on opioids and the dangers of fatal overdoses from fentanyl and carfentanil, or from impaired driving related to cannabis, the province is silent on the deadly serious problem of meth.
 
To be clear about how serious this all is, we need only to look at the case of Windy Sinclair.
 
The Manitoba Government cannot plead poverty when the Federal Government has increased funding for mental health and for housing, specifically social housing.
 
The costs of inaction – both in lives and in money - far outweigh the potential costs of solving this problem. We have heard that meth addicts run the risk of freezing their feet because they can’t feel them. We have heard that families are being torn apart not just by a loved one’s addiction, but because the costs of private treatment are so great, it is breaking them financially.
 
Every single Manitoban has known someone with an addiction. It touches every family. This government needs to send a message to Manitoba families facing this struggle: You are not alone.
 
The Manitoba government must follow up with meaningful action to ensure that we have a system for treating addiction that is humane and safe.
 
 
Manitoba Liberal Caucus:
Dougald Lamont- Manitoba Liberal Leader
Jon Gerrard – MLA for River Heights
Judy Klassen – MLA for Kewatinook
Cindy Lamoureux – MLA for Burrows

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a