Skip to main content

Conservatives bring closure to Poverty Reduction Committee

Last night in the Legislative Committee dealing with Poverty Reduction, the Conservatives abruptly brought in closure at 7:30 pm. They used their majority to vote to end the discussion even though there remained many questions yet to be asked.  With Bill 29 now before the Legislature, a bill in which the Conservatives will end the annual meetings of the poverty committee, this could be the last meeting of the committee to discuss poverty and social inclusion.   The Conservatives closed the committee for this year, and are also doing it for all years.

In my experience over 20 years, last night's committee was unusual in the speed with which the Conservatives moved to terminate the committee meeting.  Once upon a time Brian Pallister said addressing poverty was his top priority.  Yesterday his team showed it is no longer a priority.   It is sad because this happened in a year when evidence suggests poverty is increasing.  For example, the number of people going to Winnipeg Harvest each month is up substantially.

This closure of the committee was disappointing for a number of reasons:

1)  The lack of interest in addressing poverty during the COVID pandemic.

2)  The need to address the current delays with people getting access to income assistance under the provincial EIA program.  Currently, it is taking about three weeks just to get an intake appointment to get EIA.  Frankly this delay is unacceptable and it is harming people who need help.  People who are homeless usually need first to get access to EIA and then they can get access to housing.  Every day in delay in getting EIA means another day and night on the street.

3) There are a number of people who were on EIA who were able to receive the federal CERB benefit.  EIA is now clawing back the CERB moneys.   Whereas British Columbia does not consider the CERB benefit income under EIA, Manitoba does.  Under Manitoba’s EIA, the  amount of the CERB benefit is clawed back.   

Illustrative example:

One gentleman I am trying to help has a severe mental condition and was chronically homeless for many years.  Finally in 2016, he was able to get help under Manitoba’s Housing First program.  He got into housing and it made a world of difference (For years before that he had slept in bus shelters).   A number of months ago the Housing First program ended his participation.  He was able to get into Manitoba Housing and has continued to be housed.  When the pandemic arrived, he was able to get the CERB benefit.  However, EIA is now clawing that money back.  They are taking $300 a month from him out of his monthly EIA income.  Since EIA is usually just  $285 a month above rent, this is a challenge!   He is very concerned that he will not have enough money left to survive each month and could, as a result, soon become homeless again.   This would be a tragedy.   When I visited Medicine Hat to learn about their program to end homelessness, I was told they do everything they can to make sure a person who has housing stays housed because they have found it is much more expensive to have to start at the beginning and to have to search for housing and the supports that are needed again.  Sadly the individual I mention is not alone.  I am hearing that there may be quite a number of people who become homeless this fall as a result of how the province operates its EIA program.   

Comments

  1. I have been with the virus for 2 years when i was introduced by a blogger who also narrated Her story online on how she was cured by a herbal medication which was sent by doctor chala, am telling you today that my test results come out negative. Contact Dr chala on his email address dr.chalaherbalherhome@gmail.com or you can visit his website on http://drchalaherbalhome.godaddysites... or https://mywa.link/dr.chalaherbalhome

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that pre