Skip to main content

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that precisely this scenario could happen when COVID-19 got  into a personal care home. If  only the Premier had  listened,  this disaster at the Maples personal care home could have been prevented. 

Manitoba Liberals not  only warned the government three times that this could occur, we urged the government to put in place and train a rapid response team with sufficient highly trained staff to fill in the gap in up to three homes at a time when there was such a precipitous loss of staff.   We  recognized that no  personal care home, on its own,  would be able to fill the staff gaps with trained people.  There would have to be a core group of provincially trained people who could go to any care home when an outbreak occurred and particularly when there was a staff shortage. 

These three times occurred from May 22 to May 27, the last time we were sitting in the legislature before the government ended legislative sittings until the fall.  We specifically urged the government to make preparations to be ready for the second  wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Front and centre in our recommendations was putting in place a rapid response team.   Specifically I said "Manitobans have done a  great job of working to keep COVID numbers down, and we should be using this time to make sure that personal care homes stay COVID-19 free for good. The time to start preparing a medical rapid response team is now." Our press release went on to say "Personal care homes have seen a terrible  death toll during the pandemic across Canada and around the world. One major reason is that when COVID-19 strikes a personal care home, staffing can be drastically reduced because workers have to self-isolate. This was the reason the Canadian military had to be called in when outbreaks occurred at homes in Ontario and Quebec."

Our press release also mentioned "Manitoba Liberals say the PCs should take long-overdue measures to improve services at personal care homes, including a COVID-19 risk benefit for staff, increasing staffing levels and ensure that containment measures are in place."  In a blog highlighting our  press  release,  I went  further in explaining  the rationale for the rapid response team and why they needed  special training. I wrote "When there is an outbreak  in a personal care  home, there can be  many staff  who have been exposed to  the resident or  staff  member  who develops a COVID-19 infection.   This means that many of  the staff may have to  isolate or quarantine for two weeks which leaves the staffing in the care  home short.  To compensate for this short term staff are brought in who may or may not have specific experience or training in dealing with an outbreak in a personal care home. As a result of the shortage of staff in Ontario and Quebec, they have had to bring in the Canadian military to help. Manitoba needs to have a rapid response  team which has received additional training in looking after an outbreak in a long term care home. It will be much easier to assemble  such a team now and to provide them the training rather than wait until the emergency occurs."   To see my  blog which includes the press  release click on this link.

On  May 27, in a Members Statement, I repeated  my call for the province to put in place a rapid response team.  Specifically I said "When a COVID-19 infection happens in a personal care home, many of the staff will have been in contact with the affected person.  Such staff need to isolate or quarantine.  This can suddenly leave the personal care home drastically short of staff at the very time of the emergency due to the COVID-19 outbreak.  It is critical that there be a provincial rapid response team to address the staffing shortfall, to ensure highly trained personnel are present at the time of the outbreak and to make sure that such personnel are trained in the care of elderly individuals with dementia as well as in carrying out critical protocols with respect to infection control.  There also needs to be protocols in place in all personal care homes with rooms with more than one resident to ensure single isolation rooms are available when an outbreak occurs."  To see the full Members Statement clink on this link:  

Again on May 27, I repeated  for a  third  time my concern about the need for a rapid response team by asking a question in Question Period. I asked "I ask the minister: Is he ensuring adequate oversight of personal-care homes in Manitoba, and when will he put in place a well-trained rapid response team to go to any home in Manitoba where there is a COVID-19 outbreak?"  The Premier replied,  but attacked  me rather  than listening to the question and recognizing what  needed to be done.  The full question and response can  be  seen at this link.

Sadly, the  Premier never put the rapid response team in place until major outbreaks were already underway.  It was too late.   If he  had done this when we called for it in May, the members of the team would have all been very well  trained and ready to control outbreaks such as the one that occurred at the Maples personal care home. 



Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Why was Skinner's restaurant removed from the Forks Market when there so much empty space there?

Wednesday, December 4 I asked in Question Period about the large amount of vacant space at the Forks Market, some of which had been vacant for two or more years.  I also asked specifically as to why the renowned Skinner's Restaurant was removed from the Forks Market when there is so much empty space now.  My question and the Minister's response are below.    A video of the exchange can be seen at this link - The Forks Market -  Vacancy Management Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, today The Forks Market has a lot of empty space, much of it empty for two or more years. The list of vacant space includes what was formerly Muddy Waters smokehouse, Beachcombers, Skinners, Dragon House, Aida Crystal, significant parts of Sydney's, Sushi Train, and several balcony businesses a lot–along with a lot of unused former administrative space.       The minister overseeing municipal affairs is responsible for oversight of The Forks,

An awful and uncaring Pallister government goes after the most vulnerable children in our province

Like a sleuth in the night, the Pallister government is cunningly using a bill, bill 34, [updated this is now (Oct 2020) Bill 2] called the Budget Implementation and Tax Statutes Amendment Act 2020, to prevent the return of millions of dollars which was taken away from children in the care of the government.  The monies in question are called the "Children's Special Allowances" or the "federal special allowances for children".  In brief, under Jean Chretien and Paul Martin,  a Canada Child Benefit was established to help support children.  For children in the care of child and family services, where the parents are not directly looking after the children the money is paid to the agencies to help support the children.  There was a time when these monies were being used effectively by child welfare agencies to support children.   Some agencies used these funds in part to provide services to help the children they were looking after and in part into a trust fund