Skip to main content

Third reading of Bill 46 - The Court Practice and Administration Act

On Thursday May 20, I spoke at third reading on Bill 46 – The Court Practice  and Administration Act.  My comments (from  Hansard) are below.

Bill 46–The Court Practice and Administration Act
(Various Acts Amended)

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): With regard to this bill, I will start by saying that we will be supporting this legislation. We agree with some of the changes to jury remuneration and some of the other changes.

      One of the major concerns that we have is with regard to the accommodation with persons with disabilities. We've seen far too many instances where even though there is a duty to accommodate individ­uals with disabilities, this duty is too easily dismissed and people with disabilities of various natures are not given the accommodation that they should be re­ceiving in order to fully participate.

Mr. Dennis Smook, Acting Speaker, in the Chair

      And so, although there is a general duty to accommodate, historically it's been very easy to dis­miss that ability. And so that–even though the hope is that there will be more participation with indi­viduals with disabilities, this remains to be seen whether this actually will happen. And we want to emphasize the importance of courts doing what is possible in terms of accommodating people with dis­abilities, and we think that it's very important that people with disabilities are actually asked what they need to be accommodated and so that accommodation can be made.

      With those few comments, I will, in the interest of time, let us move on to other subject matter. As I said, we are supporting this in spite of some concerns.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Being able to participate matters - Let’s build a more inclusive, accessible Manitoba

Too often, our homes, buildings, and outdoor spaces are designed without sufficient consideration given to how they will impact little people, those with large bodies, or those with disabilities.  Manitoba should become a leader in designing and building new structures so they’re comfortable and accessible to all.  Further, the province needs to do more to adapt our existing infrastructure, so that it meets everyone’s needs.   The design of our built environment makes daily living a challenge for too many.  A friend, who uses a wheelchair, must call ahead wherever she goes to ensure she can enter a restaurant, store, salon, etc. A young person in River Heights has a struggle each fall to make sure that with his cerebral palsy he is able to get the support he needs to do well in school.  A large-bodied man I know has been bedridden for five months because he lacks access to a usable lift or wheelchair.  Samantha Trubyk, President of the Little People ...