Skip to main content

The need to address surgical backlogs and long waits for diagnostic and surgical procedures

 

On Thursday March 24th I had an opportunity to ask a question and to speak on a resolution focused on the need to address surgical backlogs in Manitoba. 

My Question: 

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Mr. Deputy Speaker, the question I have relates to the wait-list of 168,000 provided by doctors. The gov­ern­ment seems to provide numbers, which, if you can believe them, are lower than this.     Is there a problem in the way that the gov­ern­ment provides its numbers? Or where is the discrepancy?

      What–why are the gov­ern­ment not provi­ding accurate numbers, if that's the case?

[I was not given an answer]

My Speech on the Resolution on Surgical Backlogs 

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Mr. Deputy Speaker, wait-lists and backlogs are far too long and far too high. Doctors Manitoba reports we have 168,000 Manitobans waiting for diag­nos­tic or surgical procedures.

      We don't even have a report with numbers from the gov­ern­ment, but the doctors have a lot of credibility–in fact, probably considerably more than the gov­ern­ment at this juncture.

      People are losing their sight; they're losing their mobility; they're not able to work because they are waiting and even some people are dying.

      This is a result, in part, of very poor planning during the pandemic itself. The backlog should have been addressed starting in May of 2020, almost two years ago, with plans. Instead, the gov­ern­ment delayed, delayed and delayed. Other provinces did much better and don't have as much in the way of backlogs.

      We need to address these long wait-lists. We need to measure wait times better so they more accurately reflect what's actually happening. We've suggested as well that the gov­ern­ment remove the cap on surgical procedures. It's a NDP-PC cap that's been there for a long while. There's no reason or rationale for that except that it delays people more.

      We've called on the gov­ern­ment to provide the critical funding needed so that more eye surgeries can be done and more procedures can be done to make up this deficit.

      We are far behind when it comes to eye surgeries. The latest numbers I have for WRHA alone is almost 10,000 people on the wait-list for eye surgery. It is unbelievable that there is no ophthalmologist on the task force, given how im­por­tant this is to so many people.

      The in­cred­ible costs of such delayed surgeries are large in falls, in injuries because people can't see as well as they need to; the extra costs of people not being able to work; the extra costs of the procedures being more complicated when the surgery is not done as quickly.

      The cataracts get harder, more difficult to remove, and this is typical not just of eye surgeries but of others as well. Getting things done quickly and on time actually saves money.

      The NDP have talked about trusting the NDP but the fact is that the NDP left a mess. There were large wait-lists for eye surgeries and for other surgeries when they left office, and there was clearly major things which needed to be addressed.

      The gov­ern­ment has allocated $50 million, but we have no idea what that's based on or how it's going to be spent because the gov­ern­ment has not given us a plan, and the estimates that we've seen are that it's probably going to be a lot more costly than that.

      I've been getting calls daily of people who are waiting on the backlog who are in pain, who need these surgeries if they're going to live, if they're going to work. There's a lot to be done. It needs to be done quickly instead of waiting and waiting.

      I called on the Minister of Health (Ms. Gordon) to act in a question in question period on March the 3rd. She said they would have their wait time report the next day on March the 4th, but it didn't arrive and it still hasn't arrived.

      This gov­ern­ment is late, it is in trouble and it is not doing well on health care, Mr. Speaker.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Manitoba Liberal accomplishments

  Examples of Manitoba Liberal accomplishments in the last three years Ensured that 2,000 Manitoba fishers were able to earn a living in 2020   (To see the full story click on this link ). Introduced a bill that includes retired teachers on the Pension Investment Board which governs their pension investments. Introduced amendments to ensure school aged children are included in childcare and early childhood education plans moving forward. Called for improvements in the management of the COVID pandemic: ·          We called for attention to personal care homes even before there was a single case in a personal care home. ·            We called for a rapid response team to address outbreaks in personal care homes months before the PCs acted.  ·          We called for a science-based approach to preparing schools to   improve ventilation and humidity long before the PCs acted. Helped hundreds of individuals with issues during the pandemic including those on social assistance

The Indigenous Science Conference in Winnipeg June 14-16

  June 14 to 16, I spent three days at the Turtle Island Indigenous Science Conference.  It was very worthwhile.   Speaker after speaker talked of the benefits of using both western or mainstream science and Indigenous science.  There is much we can learn from both approaches.   With me above is Myrle Ballard, one of the principal organizers of the conference.  Myrle Ballard, from Lake St. Martin in Manitoba, worked closely with Roger Dube a professor emeritus at Rochester Institute of Technology, and many others to make this conference, the first of its kind, a success.  As Roger Dube, Mohawk and Abenaki, a physicist, commented "My feeling is that the fusion of traditional ecological knowledge and Western science methodology should rapidly lead the researchers to much more holistic solutions to problems."   Dr. Myrle Ballard was the first person from her community to get a PhD.  She is currently a professor at the University of Manitoba and the Director of Indigenous Science