Skip to main content

Manitoba falls short in supercluster area because Premier did not put enough effort in.

On Monday the results of the first round in a national competition for funding for a supercluster were announced.  Manitoba was shut out.  Supercluster funding is designed to move a major effort forward to create national centres of innovation such as have happened in Silicon Valley in the United States.

Nine superclusters have passed the first round.   Four of these superclusters were in western Canada, one in Saskatchewan, two in Alberta and one in British Columbia.  Manitoba should have had a proposal pass the first round but we did not.

There were a number of important components in this major competition which were vital to success.

1) The Premier, if he is to be believed, did not take the time to understand the nature of the competition and the requirements for success.  He said yesterday that he was going to ask Ottawa for the criteria for the competition.  Asking after the competition is over is too late.  He should have found out before as they were publicly known.

2) Central to the supercluster effort is the creation of a very active centre of innovation in the community.   This, to date, Pallister and his government have failed to do.  Pallister may have talked about innovation but he has done little.

3) In the lead up to the competition, there was federal matching funding for post-secondary education infrastructure projects.  As an example, I understand that the University of Winnipeg had put in a proposal for infrastructure support for machine learning which is a central component of the EMILI (Enterprise Machine Intelligence and Learning Initiative) project which was at the centre of the Manitoba submission for the supercluster competition.  However, the province did not provide any funding and the federal government which requires matching provincial funding for such infrastructure funding could not provide funding because the province did not step forward.   So the lack of foresight by the province and the lack of provincial understanding of how this proposal fit into building a supercluster here held Manitoba back.

4) A group of technology investors from southern Ontario, who have already invested in the Province were ready to put $60 million into EMILI's venture arm but the province did not follow up and did not come forward with matching funding for this critical effort to create a supercluster here in Manitoba.  The Premier had an opportunity to bring major technology innovators to Manitoba to play a major role in building the supercluster.   But this he failed to do.  If you do not build the blocks one by one as opportunities come forward then you lose and lose and lose.

5) The EMILI project builds on one of the major contributions of Canadians to computer learning and artificial intelligence.  This field is moving fast.   Premier Pallister should have jumped in with support for EMILI (and not just verbal, also financial support) so that it could build in its efforts and would have the best possible chance to move forward rapidly.   This the Premier failed to do.  Because the Premier waited a year and a half and still has not provided significant funding to EMILI  this whole field is moving fast elsewhere and we have fallen behind because of the Premier's inaction.

6) Getting Manitoba's supercluster funding advanced would have benefitted from a provincial team effort including all parties in the Manitoba Legislature to ensure people in Ottawa knew this was a major provincial priority.   Gary Doer understood this and on several occasions we had all party teams go to Ottawa to speak out for Manitoba's interests.  It was effective.  Sadly, the Premier spent all his time arguing with Ottawa and has done much less well in advancing positive building projects like the development of a supercluster in Manitoba.

Add it all up, and the supercluster funding was Manitoba's to win.   We lost because the Premier did not really understand how the competition works and how he has to be a player if Manitoba is going to win. 

See the initial hype on EMILI by clicking at this link - Manitoba Hype     It is sad that the Premier did not follow through to deliver on this.


Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Manitoba Liberal accomplishments

  Examples of Manitoba Liberal accomplishments in the last three years Ensured that 2,000 Manitoba fishers were able to earn a living in 2020   (To see the full story click on this link ). Introduced a bill that includes retired teachers on the Pension Investment Board which governs their pension investments. Introduced amendments to ensure school aged children are included in childcare and early childhood education plans moving forward. Called for improvements in the management of the COVID pandemic: ·          We called for attention to personal care homes even before there was a single case in a personal care home. ·            We called for a rapid response team to address outbreaks in personal care homes months before the PCs acted.  ·          We called for a science-based approach to preparing schools to   improve ventilation and humidity long before the PCs acted. Helped hundreds of individuals with issues during the pandemic including those on social assistance

The Indigenous Science Conference in Winnipeg June 14-16

  June 14 to 16, I spent three days at the Turtle Island Indigenous Science Conference.  It was very worthwhile.   Speaker after speaker talked of the benefits of using both western or mainstream science and Indigenous science.  There is much we can learn from both approaches.   With me above is Myrle Ballard, one of the principal organizers of the conference.  Myrle Ballard, from Lake St. Martin in Manitoba, worked closely with Roger Dube a professor emeritus at Rochester Institute of Technology, and many others to make this conference, the first of its kind, a success.  As Roger Dube, Mohawk and Abenaki, a physicist, commented "My feeling is that the fusion of traditional ecological knowledge and Western science methodology should rapidly lead the researchers to much more holistic solutions to problems."   Dr. Myrle Ballard was the first person from her community to get a PhD.  She is currently a professor at the University of Manitoba and the Director of Indigenous Science