Skip to main content

Eighteen studies showing a reduction of nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture by 30% or more

In a previous blog post on nitrous oxide, I have made the point that it is feasible to reduce production of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide form agricultural sources by one third.   In this post I list eighteen studies in which nitrous oxide emissions have been reduced by 30% or more:  These studies illustrate the feasibility of reducing nitrous oxide by one-third.  It should be noted that the findings, when looked at carefully, suggest that approaches taken may need to be adapted to the particular local soil, crop and environmental conditions.

The studies showing reduction of nitrous oxide by more than 30% are listed below:

1) Using a nitrification inhibitor or polymer coated urea can reduce nitrous oxide emissions by 35-38% compared to conventional fertilizer (reference 1).
2) Using fertilizer placed at a depth of more than 5 cm, compared to a depth of less than 5 cm, combined with reduced tillage resulted in reductions of nitrous oxide of greater than 30%.  This involved a meta-analysis of 239 comparisons.   The impact of no till and reduced tillage alone to reduce nitrous oxide was most effective when carried out for more than 10 years (reference 2).
3) Using urea with a urease inhibitor and a nitrification inhibitor compared to no inhibitor reduced nitrous oxide emissions by 37% (reference 3).
4) Using urea compared to anhydrous ammonia reduced nitrous oxide production by 50% in corn fields (reference 4).
5) Using polymer coated urea decreased nitrous oxide production and poultry litter increased nitrous oxide emissions compared to other sources of nitrogen with differences from 46 to 81% in the comparisons. (reference 5).
6) Using liquid swine or dairy manure compared to solid poultry manure resulted in a 41% decrease in nitrous oxide emissions (reference 1).
7) Urea ammonium nitrate together with a nitrification inhibitor resulted in a 19 to 67% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions (reference 6).
8) Urea applied with a urease inhibitor and a nitrification inhibitor resulted in a 46% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions compared to the application of urea without any inhibitor (reference 7).
9) Polymer Coated Urea resulted in a 42% reduction of nitrous oxide emissions compared to regular urea (reference 1).
10) Urea ammonium nitrate with urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor resulted in a 61% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions compared to urea with no inhibitor (reference 1).
11) Urea ammonium nitrate with urease inhibitor and nitrification inhibitor resulted in a 41% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions compared to urea ammonium nitrate alone (reference 1).
12) Urea ammonium nitrate resulted in a 35% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions compared to urea. (reference 1).
13) Urea ammonium nitrate with soluble methylene ureas and urea trizones resulted in a 57% reduction in nitrous oxide emissions compared to the use of urea (reference 1).
14) Changes in source, time and place of application compared to standard practice have been associated with a 20 to 80 percent reduction in nitrous oxide emissions (reference 8).
15) Calcium ammonium nitrate reduced nitrous oxide emissions by 54% compared to manure (poultry, or liquid swine or liquid dairy)  (reference 1).
16) Fertilizers with urease inhibitors and nitrification inhibitors reduced nitrous oxide emissions by 38% compared to fertilizers with no inhibitors (reference 9).
17) Commercial fertilizer reduced nitrous oxide emissions by 40% compared to manure (reference 1).
18) Urea with nitrification inhibitors reduced nitrous oxide emissions by 81-100 percent compared to urea with no inhibitor (reference 10).

The references for these studies are shown below:

1. Snyder CS, Davidson EA, Smith P and Venterea RT: Agriculture: sustainable crop and animal production to help mitigate nitrous oxide emissions. In. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.  Vol 9-10: pages 46-54, 2014.
2. Van Kessel, C, Verterea R, Six J et al.  Climate, duration, and N placement determine N20 emissions in reduced tillage systems: a meta-analysis.  Glob Change Biol 19:33-44, 2013.
3. Zaman M, Nguyen ML, Blennerhassett JD et al: Reducing NH3, N20 and N03 - N losses from a pasture soil with urease or nitrification inhibitors and elemental S - amended nitrogenous fertilizers.  Biol Fertil Soils 44:693-705, 2007.
4) Venterea RT, Dolan MS, Ochsner TE: Urea decreases nitrous oxide emissions compared with anhydrous ammonia in a Minnesota corn cropping system.   Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:407-418, 2010
5. Sistani KR, Jn-Baptiste M, Lovanh N et al.  Atmospheric emissions of nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide from different nitrogen fertilizers.   J Environ Qual 40:1797-1800, 2011.
6. Omonode RA, Wyn TJ; Nitrification kinetics and nitrous oxide emissions when nitrapyrin is coapplied with urea ammonium nitrate. Agron J 105:1475-1480, 2013.
7. Halvorson AD, Snyder CS, Blaylock AD et al: Enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizers: potential role in nitrous oxide emissions mitigation.  Agron J 106:715-722, 2014.
8. Snyder CS, Fixen PE: Plant nutrient management and risks of nitrous oxide emissions.   J Soil Water Conserv 67:127A-144A, 2012.
9. Decock C: Mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from corn cropping systems in the midwestern US: potential and data gaps.  Environ Sci Technol 48:4247-4250, 2014.
10. Soares J, Cantarella H, Vargas V et al: Enhanced-efficiency fertilizers in N20 emissions from urea applied to sugarcane.   J Environ Qual  10.2134/jeq2014.02.0096, 2014.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.