Skip to main content

The Pallister government's decision to cancel the Special Drug Program was a mistake

In the late 1960s a Life-Saving Drug Program was introduced to ensure that those who needed life-saving drugs would be assured of receiving them, with the cost covered by the government.  In the late 1990s this program was changed to the Special Drugs Program.  The Pallister government has cancelled the Special Drug Program effective April 1, 2018.  On March 15, I spoke on a Member's Statement about this program, and I asked a question in Question Period.  Both are below. 

My Members Statement 

Members Statement - Termination of Special Drug Program

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, Pallister government is terminating the Special Drug Program. The elimination of this program will have a very negative impact on those who live with cystic fibrosis. Cystic fibrosis is a genetic condition. A protein, the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein, is altered in function or decreased in amount.
      Individuals with cystic fibrosis easily develop lung infections, and their lung function may be so severely affected as to lead to severe disability and death.
      The life of someone with cystic fibrosis can be dramatically improved by medications to decrease infections, to improve absorption of food and vitamins and to treat CF-related diabetes when it's present. When the lung is severely affected, lung transplantation can help. Many adults with cystic fibrosis are able, with this support, to work and be significant contributors to the economy and their community.
      It is vital that the financial support is there for the medications, as has been the practice up until now in Manitoba through the Special Drugs Program. These medications are expensive and the extra costs can mean great uncertainty for a person with cystic fibrosis. Consistent financial support for the medi­cations is essential for their mental as well as their physical health. This support is what makes it possible for people with cystic fibrosis to lead a better life.
      Such support is available in other provinces through a specific cystic fibrosis drug program in  BC, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories, Nunavut and the Yukon and through an exceptional drug program in Quebec. Manitoba has similar coverage to these other provinces now, but would fall well behind all other provinces if the special drug program was cancelled.
      The government has a choice. It can have a special drug program so that people like Devin Rey and others can stay well and work and contribute to society and have a full life. Or it can eliminate the special drug program and have people with cystic fibrosis get anxious and sick so they end up in hospital and lose their income.
My Question in Question Period:  Please note that the Minister of Health, in his reply, does not even acknowledge the fact that for people with Cystic Fibrosis, there will now be a deductible and for some this means they will have to pay up to $11,000 more a year just to get their medications.  

Cystic Fibrosis Medication Coverage

Cuts to Special Drug Program
Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, speaking of equality, those with cystic fibrosis start life with a disadvantage. All they ask for is equal opportunity when compared to others by having their medi­cations fully covered under the Special Drug Program, as happens in every other province, as I table.  [Other provinces, except Quebec, have a Cystic Fibrosis Drug Program to cover these medication costs. Quebec has an exceptional drug program which covers the cost.  With the termination of the Special Drug Program, Manitoba is now an outlier in having less support for those with cystic fibrosis.]
      The Minister of Health can have a Special Drug Program and keep people like Devin Rey well so he can work and contribute to society and have a full life. Or he can eliminate the program, as he's doing, so people will get anxious and sick so they end up in hospital, losing their income and costing the provincial health program a lot of money.
      Which will the minister choose?
Hon. Kelvin Goertzen (Minister of Health, Seniors and Active Living): Madam Speaker, in Manitoba we are fortunate to have one of the most comprehensive Pharmacare programs in all of Canada. In fact, it is such a good program the federal Liberal government is actually looking to emulate that program. All of those in Manitoba who need specialized drugs are eligible for the Pharmacare program. It is an income‑based program. It is comprehensive, it is fair and it is a leading standard for all provinces in Canada.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive
3 comments
Read more

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations
18 comments
Read more

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  
Post a Comment
Read more