Skip to main content

The Manitoba Liberal Party plan to address addictions and the methamphetamine crisis


This afternoon, Dougald Lamont announced our Liberal plan to address the addictions including the meth crisis.   The press release and backgrounder are below. 

Manitoba Liberals Announce Plan for Addictions in Manitoba

BRANDON - Alongside Kim Longstreet, Liberal Candidate for Brandon East, Manitoba Liberal Leader Dougald Lamont announced today the Liberal plan for the addictions crisis plaguing Manitoba communities. Meth addiction is a fast-moving epidemic and Manitoba is stuck reacting in slow motion.
“We haven’t heard a word on prevention from the Pallister Government. All the emphasis from the PCs and NDP has been on dealing with people in the throes of full-blown addiction with no emphasis on prevention,” said Lamont.  “We need to divert people from taking meth in the first place and make sure they can get treatment they need to recover.” 
A Manitoba Liberal Government will use a portion of the revenue from legal cannabis to implement the following:

Prevention and Intervention
Create a province-wide public awareness campaign against meth — including print, web and traditional media
-    Fund anti-gang and intervention programs so that young people can choose positive options before they are drawn into crime and drugs.

Better Treatment
-    Create a system that provides seamless service and a continuum of care so that people seeking treatment can get it
-    Create “drug stabilization units” where people in meth withdrawal can be safely held and so they can’t hurt themselves  or others
-    Extend recovery times in public treatment beds so that substance users can take the time that they need to recover
-    Fund transitional housing with mental health supports and provide further housing for people so they can recover
-    Expand harm reduction to reduce deaths and critical health incidents associated with injection drug use

Lamont said the goal of harm reduction is to recognize the humanity of substance users and keep them healthy enough to make it to recovery. 
“Every single Manitoban has known someone with an addiction. It touches every family. This government needs to send a message to Manitoba families facing this struggle: You are not alone,” said Lamont.
The Liberals have previously announced they would invest in local community safety by improving funding to local police forces and lifting the Pallister freeze on funding to municipalities. They will also share 25% of new cannabis funding with municipalities, and proposed creating a Manitoba Police Service to replace the contract policing currently being done by the RCMP. The MPS would have anti-gang and anti-drug units that could disrupt the flow of illegal drugs into the province. 

  
Backgrounder
Since Brian Pallister was first elected, Manitoba has been repeatedly hit with one addictions crisis after another. Manitoba Liberals have repeatedly called for a comprehensive plan from the Pallister Government . In October of 2017, Liberal Heath Critic Jon Gerrard questioned Premier Pallister about his plans for explosion in methamphetamine use and the governments complete inaction during their first year in office. Pallister skirted the question launching into a typical tirade about Ottawa.
In October 2018, Manitoba Liberal Leader Dougald Lamont and the Liberal caucus called on the Pallister Government to declare a public health emergency. Once again, the government turned a deaf ear to the problem.

The dramatic rise in methamphetamine use has been associated with a major increase (about 50%) in property crime in Winnipeg, with increased violence in Winnipeg hospitals, and an increased homicide rate. In short, it has caused widespread social disruption. 

The Pallister Conservative Government has done little that is coordinated, comprehensive or effective to address this methamphetamine crisis or to prevent additional methamphetamine use.
Various centres in Manitoba have been involved in helping individuals with meth addiction including the Alcohol Foundation of Manitoba, the Main Street project, the Health Sciences Centre, Morberg House, The Behavioural Health Foundation, and others. There has however, been insufficient coordination among these efforts. Individuals with a methamphetamine addiction have been left without a clear path to get help. 

Manitoba Liberals have drawn on extensive conversations with many who have been involved in various aspects of trying to address or help deal with the methamphetamine epidemic, have carefully read the reports presented and have included actions in the comprehensive plan which will address the issues raised in these reports — including the need for coordination and the need to address the various phases of an effective humane and safe treatment program for individuals taking methamphetamine. 

1.     A province-wide public awareness prevention program for adults and youth
A major education and awareness effort for youth and for adults to create a much broader understanding of the dangers of taking methamphetamine and other illicit drugs in order to reduce the level of methamphetamine use in Manitoba. For youth, this would include having information on meth addictions and its dangers taught in schools with outreach by public health nurses and addictions specialists.
2.     Create drug stabilization units so people can detox in a safe, secure setting
Setting up a centre to help individuals with meth psychosis to stabilize them and to start detoxification. These must be free and public spaces that allow substance users the time they need to recover. 
3.     Provide transitional housing with mental health supports
Coordinate and provide funding support to organizations such as Morberg House which can provide intensive residential care and support during a treatment and stabilization phase.
4.     Work with the Federal Government and municipalities on longer-term housing so substance users can resume independent living 
Coordinate and provide funding support for organizations which provide residential care with supports for an extended follow up period of up to an additional 9 to 12 months.
5.     Expand harm reduction across Manitoba
The purpose of harm reduction is to reduce the likelihood of death and infectious diseases among substance users. A single user who gets endocarditis (a heart infection associated with meth) may cost millions to treat, while ensuring they stay safe will cost less.
Meth in particular “powers” STBBI’s – Sexually Transmitted and Blood Borne Infections, including syphilis, gonorrhea and HIV, including through infected needles.
The benefits of harm reduction are a much healthier population at lower cost.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a