Skip to main content

Changes to management of Crown land being imposed by the Pallister government will have adverse effects on many beef producers and on local communities


Dougald Lamont and I met with a concerned group of ranchers in Crane River on October 13th.   The ranchers felt betrayed by the actions of the Pallister government which is making changes to the management of Crown Lands in a way that is very detrimental to their own livelihood and to the future of their ability to raise cattle in the area near Crane River and in nearby areas near St. Rose du Lac and in the Interlake.   The ranchers were supported by a representative from the Manitoba Beef Producers, Diane Riding. 

The ranchers made a strong case for continuing the “unit transfer” system.   Under this system, which has existed for some time, beef producers are allowed to transfer the rights to the land and to sell the rights to lease and use the Crown land.  In the system, beef producers are rewarded when they make improvements to the land.  Under this system beef producers can build up equity in their operations and then when they retire, they can sell the rights to lease the land as a unit so that they will have a “pension” for when they retire.   The producers are very skeptical of what the government is proposing which is that producers would negotiate compensation for improvements to the individual or company which wins the rights to use the land at auction.  We talked to producers who have put hundreds of thousands of dollars in improvements to the land they have leased.  These include improvements like fences and dugouts.   It is pretty hard to take such improvements with you when your lease expires, and the producers felt the only way to be assured that they would get the money invested back was to be able to continue the unit transfer.   Not having the unit transfer would make it less likely that ranchers would invest in improvements to the land, or would be good environmental stewards of the land.   It is also to be noted that some producers in this area were specifically told at some point that they were not allowed to buy the land itself, so that a number of producers have leased Crown Land as the majority of the land that they graze their cattle on.    The producers are fine with the auction system being used for unused land, and land which has reverted to the Crown, but feel strongly that land which is actively being used by producers should keep the unit transfer system.

A second major concern was the increased costs of the lease by about 350% over the next two years.   This is a very rapid increase, particularly for producers with marginal land who have had to face both drought and flood conditions in the last few years.   This increase would put a number of the long term producers out of business.  It was noted that for some producers the marginal nature of the land was such that 90% is swamp.  Another said his land had more cattails than hay.  This is not the same as high quality Crown Land available elsewhere.   For a number of the producers, they were sacrificed in 2011 when these areas were flooded to save Winnipeg, and in one year since then.   They feel they are now being sacrificed again and that this time it will have a severe adverse impact on their local community.  They have put their heart and soul into investing in the land and in their community and they are disappointed, angry and frustrated by the actions of the Pallister government. Diane Riding of the Manitoba Beef Producers was very supportive of these ranchers and she said a lot of the input from the Manitoba Beef Producers was not adequately listened to by the government when it made its decision to change the system.

We also heard from a number of ranchers who had come from elsewhere because they saw Manitoba as a land of opportunity.   They now feel the opportunity is being lost and their future is being taken away.   We also heard that, contrary to the claims of the Pallister government, the changes being imposed on them will make it considerably more difficult for young ranchers to enter the system and begin raising cattle. 

We listened carefully to what we heard and we have decided to support the ranchers in our efforts in the Legislature, and to ensure people elsewhere in Manitoba have a better understanding of the implications of the Pallister government’s policies on people and on communities.


Comments

  1. I saw a health promotion on a herbalist from West Africa who prepares herbal medicines to cure all sorts of diseases including HIV and many others sickness, I first doubted It was not true but decided to try, when I contacted this herbal physician so lucky I was cure right now am so happy don't lose hope to contact him on time
    via his e-mail, dr.chalaherbalhome@gmail.com or you can visit his website on https://
    drchalaherbalhome.godaddysites.com or https://mywa.link/dr.chalaherbalhome i was totally cure from the virus
    All THANKS TO YOU DR,CHALA FOR HELPING ME GET MY HAPPINESS BACK ������❤️❤️❤️

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that pre