Skip to main content

Health and Dental care for those with severe airborne latex allergies

On October 2 I asked in Health Estimates measures that the government is taking to address the fact that an individual in Brandon is having to go out of province for health care because she can't be sure the health care clinics and hospitals in the Prairie Mountain Health region or elsewhere in Manitoba are latex safe.   Part of the issue here is that when a person is sensitive to latex in the air (an airborne as opposed to a contact allergy) that it is important to have a facility which does not use latex - in particular latex gloves or balloons in the building - and this includes gloves used in the cleaning and food services departments and not just in the direct delivery of care.   I asked about this issue in Estimates.  My questions and the Minister's responses are - from Hansard - below:

Mr. Gerrard: I have been talking with an individual who lives in Brandon who is having trouble getting access to health care and to dental care in Brandon. She has a severe latex allergy and there is apparently a difficulty there, whether it's a doctor's office or a dental office or the hospital, in having latex-safe care, and it seems to me this is something that the minister could look at.
Mr. Friesen: I thank the member for the question. I happen to have at the table today the CEO for the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority who is informing me, of course. And I know something about this issue as well. And this issue has from time to time been the subject of public interest. And I've seen more media reports, not just in Manitoba, but external to our jurisdiction, that talk about the same sensitivities and allergies when it comes to latex.
The CEO for WRHA informs me that there are procedures and protocols in place in the WRHA when someone has a latex allergy so that that individual can be accommodated in clinic, in hospital, for a surgical procedure, for a pre- and post-procedure. [The problem appears to be that the procedures and protocols are for dealing with a contact allergy to latex and not for dealing with an airborne allergy to latex which requires  more stringent measures] Through our   commitment to centralized planning and co‑ordination of the system, while we don't have the other CEOs here at the table today, it would be my strong expectation that these kind of commitments become harmonized throughout the system.
It would certainly be our desire for–and this is–it forms an excellent opportunity to talk just about that commitment to consistent delivery of care. If the member has particular concerns around this area, he'd be happy to also write to me or direct us to other advancements that he has seen in other jurisdictions that we should also be aware of here in Manitoba.
Mr. Gerrard: Yes, it has been a particular issue because she has been referred to various places and too often when she goes there she finds that there are latex gloves being used, whether it's in the cleaning or in other areas, and so it then becomes a problem.
She needed a particular surgical procedure and went to Brandon and was told that they couldn't guarantee they could do it in a way that was latex-safe, and she ended up having to go out of province in order to have successful treatment.
     Mr. Friesen: I know it's pertaining to a specific casework file–we're all at the table here a bit confused at the notion that the individual had to seek surgical procedure out of province as a result. And I'd be willing to look into the issue more if the member wanted to later on share more information. We know, as we've shared today, that there are protocols and procedures in place in our system for people who have an allergic reaction to the use of latex in hospital activities, and so we are attempting to accommodate those individuals, but that means that the practice needs to be consistent, which is exactly the reason we're introducing the concept of shared health. Bill 10 has been introduced in this Legislature. The creation of a shared service model for health human resource planning, for procurement for ICT planning, for other capital planning and all of those needs that are so important in our system.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a