Skip to main content

Speaking in support of better measures to help individuals with addictions and to prevent deaths from overdoses

March 4, I had the opportunity to speak on a bill dealing with making sure there is regular reporting of death from overdoses from drugs like opioids.  My comments, from Hansard, are below.

 

Bill 217–The Fatality Inquiries Amendment Act
(Overdose Death Reporting)

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, first I want to express my con­dol­ences to the member for Point Douglas (Mrs. Smith) about the loss of her father. It was tragic, and it speaks clearly to the point of this bill. I ap­pre­ciate the passion of the MLA for Point Douglas for getting improved addiction–help and treatment for addictions. It's a passion which I share. We need to much better recog­nize and prevent overdoses and much better treat addictions in Manitoba.

      We need–it is actually astonishing that the gov­ern­ment, elected first in 2016, not being accountable, has worked so hard for almost six years to block account­ability and reporting of essential infor­ma­tion. If you have data, regularly report it monthly. You're able to move and react more quickly. You can adjust and improve. A gov­ern­ment which does not report regularly–monthly, in this case–is not sufficiently interested in improving. You can't fix what you don't measure is a mantra which is often raised. A gov­ern­ment which is not interested in reporting is not interested in fixing.

      There are, and have been for decades, deficiencies in addictions help and care in Manitoba. Our gov­ern­ments have tinkered rather than solved problems. We need to do much better.

      There will be an inquest soon on Lee Earnshaw, who died June 14th, 2021. It is a very sad story of a com­mercial fisherman who was loved by his family, who tried many times to get help, including three times at rapid access clinic. The story has exposed major deficiencies in addictions care in Manitoba.

      In summary, Madam Speaker, we support this legis­lation. It's badly needed, and I thank the MLA for Point Douglas for bringing it forward.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being able to participate matters - Let’s build a more inclusive, accessible Manitoba

Too often, our homes, buildings, and outdoor spaces are designed without sufficient consideration given to how they will impact little people, those with large bodies, or those with disabilities.  Manitoba should become a leader in designing and building new structures so they’re comfortable and accessible to all.  Further, the province needs to do more to adapt our existing infrastructure, so that it meets everyone’s needs.   The design of our built environment makes daily living a challenge for too many.  A friend, who uses a wheelchair, must call ahead wherever she goes to ensure she can enter a restaurant, store, salon, etc. A young person in River Heights has a struggle each fall to make sure that with his cerebral palsy he is able to get the support he needs to do well in school.  A large-bodied man I know has been bedridden for five months because he lacks access to a usable lift or wheelchair.  Samantha Trubyk, President of the Little People ...

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Debating the importance of the french language, education in french and french services in Manitoba

Thursday, May 17, we had a debate on a resolution on french language education and french language services in the Manitoba.   The debate arose because the Pallister government has made major cutbacks in french language education.  In part these cuts have reduced the status and funding for   le Bureau de l'éducation française which is the division of the Department of Education which deals with education in french.   Several items are notable:  The Pallister Conservatives block a motion to have the normal full hour of debate.   Hon. Jon  Gerrard  (River Heights):  I have a question. Before I ask it, this is a pretty important subject and I'd like to have leave to make sure that we have a full hour of debate, and so the debate would go 'til about 12:15. Mr. Deputy Speaker:  Has there been leave to go to 12:15? An Honourable Member:  Agreed. An Honourable Member:  No. Mr. Deputy Speaker:  N...