Bill 5–The Coat of
Arms, Emblems
and the Manitoba Tartan Amendment Act
Hon.
Jon Gerrard (River Heights): First,
let me begin by saying that we support this bill, this legislation. We think
that it is a worthwhile initiative for polar bears to become a mammalian emblem
for Manitoba.
Polar
bears are amazing mammals. They have captured our imagination. Churchill in
Manitoba is one of the few places in the world where tourists come in substantial
numbers to see polar bears. Our Winnipeg Zoo has a special display for polar
bears where they can be swimming and living in a model polar bear environment.
A number
of years ago, Robert Taylor presented to the world his iconic photos of polar
bears, and they remind us of the beauty and the majesty of this bear to this
day.
Yet
there is, at the same time, a real threat to polar bears in our province. With
global warming, it is predicted that polar bears may not survive in Manitoba by
the end of this century. The polar bear in Manitoba is listed as a species
which is threatened. It is threatened at least in part because the warming
climate may so change the environment along Hudson's Bay in northern Manitoba
that it's no longer hospitable for polar bears. And yet, sadly, associated with
this bill, there is no plan to ensure polar bears will survive in Manitoba into
the next century.
It would
be uncommon, to say the least, for a province or a country to name, as a
symbol of its jurisdiction, an animal which would not be around for long term
in our province unless there is a newly developed and innovative plan to enable
polar bears to survive here.
The
minister brings up the case of the mosasaur. The mosasaur, of course, is a
different type of symbol, a symbol of the time many, many thousands of years
ago when mosasaurs lived in Manitoba, and all we have is skeletons. This is
very different from the case of the polar bear.
I have
seen no exhibitions of skeletons of polar bears. People are interested in
seeing the real bear and photos of the real bear. I hope the minister is not
planning to display a skeleton of the polar bear like that of the mosasaur. We
hope it will always be live polar bears and not a skeleton, which is the
symbol–a mammal symbol of Manitoba.
The government
could have done much better. The government could have provided a plan for
the future of polar bears in Manitoba, but it has not. The government could
have provided an updated plan for the region around Churchill. The government
could have consulted with local Indigenous groups, like the Fox Lake First
Nation. The government could have considered making changes, like moving the
current wildlife management area to become a provincial polar bear park. But,
sadly, none of these have happened or is happening.
The–a
year ago, the government made changes to the use of the current wildlife
management area near Churchill to issue new permits without reviews, without
an open process so that various people could apply, but rather with a process
which only offered two permits to a major Progressive Conservative party donor.
The minister spoke of this subject being not a political subject, but, indeed,
it is his government which has made it a political subject.
Sadly,
the polar bear should be an unblemished, pure symbol for Manitobans, and that
is how, I think, most Manitobans would consider it. And we would hope that in
the future, whatever governments are present, that they will provide more
open and transparent processes and make sure that there is the wildlife
studies which support the decisions which are to be made.
So, in the future–as we move to the future, we need not only to consider and support, as we are today, making polar bears a symbol, a mammal symbol of our province. We have work to do to ensure the survival of polar bears in Manitoba. We have work to do to make sure that we're symbolizing real bears and not skeletons of bears, and we have work to do in the planning that needs to be done in the future around the city of Churchill so that it will be open and transparent and fair. And if we move forward in a co‑operative spirit and not in a politicized spirit, as the government has been doing.
With
those words, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I will end my remarks. I look forward to
this bill going to committee and discussions there. And I hope that it moves
forward so that we will have the polar bear as a symbol of Manitoba, and hope
that the real polar bear survives as well, so that the symbol and the real bear
can proceed for many, many long years into the future.
Thank
you.
March 16: Third
Reading
Mr.
Gerrard: Mr. Speaker, the polar bears are amazing
animals. They are iconic. They are found during parts of the year very
frequently in Churchill. Although I have been to Churchill a couple of times,
one of the sad parts of my trips to Churchill was that I have not yet seen a
polar bear and I hope to yet. Seeing polar bears in the wild is an experience
which I think more and more people should have and, hopefully–hopefully–this
bill will be part of a movement to try and make sure that polar bears will be
part of Manitoba and will live in the wild in Manitoba for a long, long, long
time into the future.
But, of
course, that future right now is in question. People are already talking about
the likelihood that polar bears will no longer be in the wild in Manitoba by
the end of this century. We have to be careful that we don't have an emblem
which is going to disappear from our province. We need an action plan; we need
an approach which is going to make sure that polar bears are here for years and
years to come.
Seeing a
polar bear in the Assiniboine zoo is an incredible experience. The display
that was put together there is a marvellous example of what can be done to
give animals a habitat and an ecosystem in a very small scale, which better
mimics the ecosystem in the wild. It is, I think, an example of what should be
the situation for many, many more of the animals who are in our Assiniboine
zoo. That they should have the space that is more similar to their wild space,
they should have more room than a small cage and that we should consider the
animals and the environment which they are in as increasingly important.
What
will it take to ensure that polar bears continue to live in the wild in
Manitoba?
Probably, first and foremost, it will take a major effort to address climate
change, to arrest what is so rapidly occurring at the moment, which is an
increase in global temperatures, a decrease in winter temperatures–or, an
increase in winter temperatures, and an increase that occurs particularly in
northern parts of the world and in mid-continent areas.
And so,
the polar bears are particularly susceptible to climate change, and they need
the kind of environment that we have currently in Manitoba. And, if the ice is
gone completely on Hudson Bay and if there are no longer the sort of winters
that we've had in and around Hudson Bay and particularly around Churchill,
then the polar bears may not be around. And, of course, with that comes not
only an increase in temperature, but an increase in the volatility.
Here, we
have increased floods, increased fires. Exactly what that will mean to the area
around Churchill, I suspect we don't know for sure, except that probably a lot
of the areas which have permafrost up there now will no longer have permafrost.
We will see much more in the way of marshes instead of frozen permafrost areas,
and it will be quite a big change. And that big change will not necessarily be
good for polar bears.
So,
Mr. Deputy Speaker, I am in strong support of the polar bear being a
symbol for Manitoba. I raise concerns over its future because I think we should
all be concerned, and we should all be working not just to make it a symbol,
but to do what we can to make sure that polar bears live in the wild in
Manitoba for a long time to come.
Thank
you.
Comments
Post a Comment