Skip to main content

Bill 23–The Commodity Futures Amendment and Securities Amendment Act - protecting people's investments

Wednesday May 23, I spoke in the Manitoba Legislature on Bill 23 which provides an increased ability of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) to regulate investment dealers in Canada, and to file a decision made my an IIROC panel with the courts in order to enforce payment of fines.   It is to be hoped that this bill will enable better enforcement so that Manitobans who have money invested will be protected from unscrupulous investment dealers.

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Mr. Speaker, just–I want to put a few comments on the record on this bill.
      Having worked hard to support individuals in the past who were affected by situations in which they lost significant amounts of money from money that had been invested as a result of people, advisors and others, providing poor advice, I believe that this bill is badly needed. It is an important bill, and in the Liberal Party, we are strong supporters of these measures.
      I think it is noteworthy that, in addition to the measures which are here, that we believe that there should have been some measures which would have provided to IIROC the ability, the legal authority, to compel evidence so that they are able to conduct full and fair investigations and hearings.
      The Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada has done a good job, but they have been restricted in what they can do in the past. Other provinces are moving ahead to make sure that they are better supported and this bill will provide that better support except for in the area of providing IIROC the legal authority to compel evidence.
      Currently, IIROC can only compel IIROC registrants to co-operate with the disciplinary investigations and prosecutions. There's no ability to compel co-operation of individuals or entities who are not related by IIROC, for example, former registrants, stock issuers, banks, during investigation or to testify at a hearing, even when they have relevant evidence.
      As a result of this, investigations may be closed at an early stage due to lack of information. Prosecutions may proceed without the best evidence possible or may not proceed due to insufficient evidence even when there are grounds to believe that serious misconduct has taken place. Seeking the ability to compel evidence is consistent with powers granted to the Manitoba Securities Commission under the Securities Act and therefore would be consistent as well as being valuable, so it would have been nice to have an amendment to provide the ability to compel evidence.
      In spite of the fact that this is a shortfall with the current bill, we're certainly ready to support the bill as it is because it will be a significant step forward.
      Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that pre