Skip to main content

Pallister PCs vote against extending the ability of police to detain and help intoxicated persons to those on methamphetamine

On Tuesday May 22, my colleague Cindy Lamoureux, MLA for Burrows, introduced for second reading Bill 229, the Intoxicated Persons Detention Amendment Act, a bill which would clarify the current legal situation with respect to the ability of police to detain individuals intoxicated by drugs.   Currently the Intoxicated Persons Detention Act allows police to detain and help individuals who are intoxicated by alcohol.   The situation with respect to the ability of police to detain and help individuals who are intoxicated from taking methamphetamine is less clear.  Indeed, we hear that because of this uncertainty, and because of a court ruling that the Intoxicated Persons Detention Act only applies to alcohol intoxication, the police are sometimes in a difficult situation.  We understand that sometimes police may follow a person who is intoxicated by methamphetamine until he or she commits a crime so that they can detain and help the person with legal certainty.  I have been told of situations where the police have been called to help an individual who is intoxicated with meth, and the police say they can do nothing because they don't have the legal authority to detain the individual.  Last year, over the Christmas holidays a woman who was intoxicated with meth came for help at a Winnipeg  Emergency Room, but because of the uncertain legal situation she could not be detained and helped when she wanted to leave.  She left and was later found dead.   Surely we should be able to better help those who are intoxicated by methamphetamine.   In the Question Period during the debate on Bill 229, I asked Cindy Lamoureux about this situation.   See below (from Hansard). 
Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, to my colleague.
      Around Christmastime there was a young woman who went to Seven Oaks who was intoxicated with meth, and she didn't stay, but she  left and she was found dead not long after. It was a very tragic event.
      Can you explain how this bill might prevent tragedies like that by being able to detain people?
Ms. Lamoureux: I'd like to thank my colleague from River Heights for the question.
      That's a great example of really what is happening and what we are trying to prevent from  happening again in the future. We need to be  proactive on this. By implementing this bill, it allows health-care professionals as well as our peace  officers to have the resources they need to properly work with people and provide people the  resources they need in a time of crisis during addictions.
Sadly, when it came time for a vote to move this legislation to committee so it could move forward, be considered, amended if needed, and then be passed into law, the Pallister PCs all voted against Bill 229.    As Liberals we were saddened and shocked to see that the Pallister PCs were not concerned enough about this situation, and about helping people methamphetamine toxicity to proceed.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

Karen Keppler 1953 - 2020

  Karen was an incredible person who helped so many people. She had a heart of gold. Back in 1994 to 1997 we worked closely together to help communities all over Manitoba get connected to the internet. In the years since she has done amazing things.   She has served as Chair of the Winnipeg Library Foundation and helped with raising money for the expansion of the Millenium Library.    She helped many people to get new opportunities through the Selkirk and District Learning Centre and through her activities at the University of Winnipeg and the Herzing College.   She was an entrepreneur who helped many people move forward and start successful businesses.  Karen was very concerned about her community.  In she was   the Manitoba Liberal Party candidate in Sekirk constituency.   When the COVID pandemic came, Karen was really helpful in an effort to get computers for kids in need so that they could learn at home. Even recently when I was working to understand lead pollution and lead effects