Skip to main content

Calling for Pallister to address raw sewage going into the Red and Assiniboine Rivers

Today, beside the Assiniboine River, I called for action from Brian Pallister and his government to address the raw sewage going into our Red and Assiniboine Rivers. 

Winnipeg has a proportion of the sewage going into pipes which combine the removal of sewage with the drainage of rainwater,  The result is that when it rains there is an overflow of sewage into our rivers.  This is not a good situation.  

In December 2015, the City of Winnipeg presented a master plan to the province in which several options were spelled out for addressing this problem.  These options, costing between $830 million and $4 billion vary from a partial to a full separation of sewage and rainwater.  The City is now waiting for a letter from the Province as to which option the Province will mandate.    However, in the 16 months since the election of the Pallister government no such letter has been sent.  Today I called on the Pallister government to end the delaying and to get to work and send the letter. 

At the same time, I indicated my view that whatever the short term requirement of the City may be, it is important to keep the goal of having a full separation of sewage and rainfall,   Indeed, I called for the province to ensure that the letter contains a requirement for the City to have a plan and timeline for the full separation. 

Ending the use of pipes which combine sewer and rainfall, and achieving full separation of the combined sewer pipes is important for three reasons:

1) The full separation of the combined sewers will end the dumping of raw sewage into the Red and Assiniboine Rivers.  This will decrease the phosphorous going into the Red and Assiniboine Rivers and decrease the algal problems on Lake Winnipeg. 

2) Raw sewage contains infectious agents including coliform bacteria like E. Coli and Salmonella, viruses like the norovirus and hepatitis A and parasites like cryptosporidium and cyclospora.   Our rivers are used recreationally and they should be safe from a health perspective and this means eliminating the use of combined sewers. 

3) With climate change we can expect more severe rainfall events.   This will result in more raw sewage going into the Red and Assiniboine Rivers unless we eliminate the combined sewers and achieve the separation which will mean all the sewage goes through a sewage treatment plant before going into our rivers. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations
18 comments
Read more

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a
1 comment
Read more