Skip to main content

We must put community needs and community input into health care decisions

Community involvement in health care decisions is fundamental to putting patients first and to improving our health care system. In the wake of many recent poorly considered Pallister government health care decisions which have not had community input, it is clear that we need a process which puts community input into decisions made by our provincial government and regional health authorities.  Below are my comments from a press conference earlier today in front of the Victoria Hospital. 

"We are here today in front of the Victoria Hospital, the location of the Mature Women’s Centre which is being closed by the Pallister government.   Closing the Mature Women’s Centre is a bad decision.  It has an incredible health care team – doctors, nurses, a pharmacist, a dietitian and a kinesthesiologist – which does excellent work and uses approaches which keep women healthier and are at lower cost than traditional approaches.  It is one example of recent arbitrary and indiscriminate Pallister government cuts which are not taking community needs into consideration. 

I am here today to call on the Pallister government to move to elected regional health authority boards which are elected by the people as we do with school boards.  I also call on Pallister’s government to move away from global budgets for RHAs to budgets based on services delivered.  These two changes, to elected regional health authority boards and budgets based on services delivered will provide accountability to our communities for delivery of services and accountability financially.

In the present system, RHA boards are appointed by the Minister and are accountable to the Minister.  When a board members disagrees with the government the appointee can be removed. In the last few months, board members have been completely ineffective in speaking up for community needs.  Elected RHA boards will be able to speak up for community needs.   At the same time moving away from global budgets to budgets based on services delivered provides the financial accountability needed – accountability which has been lacking under appointed boards and global budgets.

I want also to add, that if I am elected the leader of the Manitoba Liberal Party in October, this will be a priority issue for me, and were Liberals to form government in 2020, these are changes I would implement."

Comments

  1. Canadian Seniors August 28, 2017 at 12:26 PM

    Thank you Jon for your support for the community health needs of all people in Manitoba. Too often the focus for health care is for those within the city limits, but those in rural Manitoba have a tougher time accessing services and having the right care, in the right time at the right place - something that since the revamping of health care began without serious public information and consultation, we are left with fear and lack of knowledge as to what the outcome will be for Manitoba's citizens.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manitoba School Boards have contributed much innovation and advancement of education in Manitoba

On Thursday March 25, in Question Period, I asked the Premier why he is getitng rid of school boards when they have contributed to much to the improvement of education in Manitoba.  My question and the Premier's response are below (from Hansard).  Manitoba Education System Elimination of Boards and Divisions Hon. Jon  Gerrard  (River Heights):   Madam Speaker, Manitoba school boards have been an incredible source of new ideas and innovation.       The White Horse Plains school board brought in audio and video links to Hutterite schools. The Seine River School Division piloted Roots of Empathy, to help kids learn empathy, and also Kids at Play: half-day kindergarten, half-day early-childhood education. The Seven Oaks School Division brought in Met schools. And there are many, many more examples.       Why is the Premier getting rid of school boards when they've done so well at listening to parents, at ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations
18 comments
Read more

Being able to participate matters - Let’s build a more inclusive, accessible Manitoba

Too often, our homes, buildings, and outdoor spaces are designed without sufficient consideration given to how they will impact little people, those with large bodies, or those with disabilities.  Manitoba should become a leader in designing and building new structures so they’re comfortable and accessible to all.  Further, the province needs to do more to adapt our existing infrastructure, so that it meets everyone’s needs.   The design of our built environment makes daily living a challenge for too many.  A friend, who uses a wheelchair, must call ahead wherever she goes to ensure she can enter a restaurant, store, salon, etc. A young person in River Heights has a struggle each fall to make sure that with his cerebral palsy he is able to get the support he needs to do well in school.  A large-bodied man I know has been bedridden for five months because he lacks access to a usable lift or wheelchair.  Samantha Trubyk, President of the Little People ...
Post a Comment
Read more