Skip to main content

Dwarfism Awareness Day 2020



Today, October 25th is Dwarfism Awareness Day in Manitoba.  To honour this day, I will put material below from the Little People of Manitoba to help create additional awareness about dwarfism.  The photo above is of Samantha Rayburn-Trubyk, the President of the Little People of Manitoba.

Who are we? 

Little People of Manitoba (LPM) is a non-profit, charitable organization dedicated to creating awareness about the prominent issues affecting people with dwarfism, and providing social support for Little People of Manitoba. 

Why are we so small?

This is the most common question asked of a little person.  The simplest answer is that we are born that way.  Being small is just part of our physical makeup, much like the colour of our eyes or hair.  The condition is known as dwarfism and is caused by a genetic mutation that happens in about 1 in approximately every 30,000 births.  More than 80% of little people  are born to average-sized parents with no history of dwarfism in the family. 

Are Little People less intelligent than average sized people?

There is no correlation between physical size and intelligence.  Persons of short stature (Little People) fulfill many positions in society that are traditionally associated with being among the most intelligent.  There are numerous examples of people with dwarfism who are highly respected doctors, lawyers, scientists, analysts, teachers, athletes, politicians, actors, writers, artists, musicians and business people. 

What are the most common types of dwarfism?

There are more than 200 different types of dwarfism, but the most frequently diagnosed form is Achondroplasia, a genetic condition that results in disproportionately short arms and legs.  The average height of adults born with achondroplasia is 4.0 feet.   Other relatively common genetic conditions that result in disproportionately short stature include Spondyloepiphyseal Dysplasia congenita (SEDc), Diastrophic Dysplasia, Pseudoachondroplasia, Hypochondroplasia and Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI).

Why  is the term "midget" so offensive?

Like many other words that were once commonly used to describe different segments of the population, the word "midget" is offensive to little people, and no longer has a place in modern vocabulary.  The term dates back to the mid 19th century during the height of the "freakshow" era, and was generally applied only to short-statured persons who were put on display for public amusement.   The link between the word "midget" and the negative objectification of the person make it unacceptable today.  

Such terms as dwarf, little person, LP, and person of short stature are all acceptable, but most people would rather be called by their name than a label. 

More information on the Little People of Manitoba can be found by clicking on this link. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive
3 comments
Read more

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations
18 comments
Read more

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  
Post a Comment
Read more