Skip to main content

Pallister government is trying to use a budget bill to prevent his government from being sued over its poor handling of services for children

On September 16, we raised concerns about clauses in a budget bill which will prevent his government from being sued for their poor handling of  services for children.    Our full press release is below. 

PCs Must Remove Measures that Undermine Vulnerable Children from Budget

TREATY 1 TERRITORY,  WINNIPEG, MB - Grand Chief Jerry Daniels of the Southern Chiefs’ Organization (SCO) and Dougald Lamont, Manitoba Liberal Leader and MLA for St. Boniface, say the PCs must withdraw two measures from the budget that are designed to shield the Manitoba Government from being held responsible for the mistreatment of children in care. 

The PCs have introduced two “get out of jail free” clauses in their budget bill that deny people who have been wronged by the Manitoba Government for suing for compensation  with both cases involving vulnerable children in the care of Child and Family Services (CFS). 

Unlike other bills, budget bills don’t go before committees for public hearings. 

One budget measure seeks to shield the Provincial Government from being held responsible for clawing back tens of millions of dollars in benefits intended for children in care. The Manitoba Government is currently being sued by former wards of CFS to get their money back. If the budget passes, the lawsuit will effectively end and the PC Government will keep the money.

As the number of children in care rose to over 10,000 during the 2000’s scoop, the Manitoba Government diverted more and more children’s allowances into general revenue. Between 1999 and 2016, the NDP government diverted approximately $250-million. Since 2016, the PCs have diverted over $100-million.

In February, 2019, the Manitoba Government ordered the eviction of children’s home where high-risk, high-needs children were being cared for. The home, at 800 Adele, was in regular use and had special suites and security features to keep the children secure. 

Without consultation or warning, children in care were ousted from their beds and evicted in the middle of the night. The Pallister PCs then introduced a law with just two purposes: to cancel the lease between the Southern Authority and a private landlord, and stop anyone from suing the government for doing it.

“Our children’s resources are being stolen and Pallister is wanting to legislate himself out of being accountable for it. If the Pallister Government believes they’re right in taking the children’s money, why does he not want the courts to decide?” said Grand Chief Jerry Daniels. “In addition to this, the Pallister Government orchestrated a midnight move claiming there is no need for children to be given a home here. This was politically motivated because the public knows for a fact when it comes to creating safe homes for our children, there is a great need.”

 “The Pallister PCs are using a budget bill to do an end-run around the courts,” said Manitoba Liberal Leader Dougald Lamont. “The law is there to hold people to their word, and these measures set a terrible precedentthat the Premier gets to pick and choose who the law applies to, which contracts are valid, and whether wrongdoing will be held to account. These measures must be stripped from the budget bill.” 


Comments

  1. I have been with the virus for 2 years when i was introduced by a blogger who also narrated Her story online on how she was cured by a herbal medication which was sent by doctor chala, am telling you today that my test results come out negative. Contact Dr chala on his email address dr.chalaherbalherhome@gmail.com or you can visit his website on http://drchalaherbalhome.godaddysites... or https://mywa.link/dr.chalaherbalhome

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Manitoba Liberal accomplishments

  Examples of Manitoba Liberal accomplishments in the last three years Ensured that 2,000 Manitoba fishers were able to earn a living in 2020   (To see the full story click on this link ). Introduced a bill that includes retired teachers on the Pension Investment Board which governs their pension investments. Introduced amendments to ensure school aged children are included in childcare and early childhood education plans moving forward. Called for improvements in the management of the COVID pandemic: ·          We called for attention to personal care homes even before there was a single case in a personal care home. ·            We called for a rapid response team to address outbreaks in personal care homes months before the PCs acted.  ·          We called for a science-based approach to preparing schools to   improve ventilation and humidity long before the PCs acted. Helped hundreds of individuals with issues during the pandemic including those on social assistance

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations