Skip to main content

Bill 12 The Crown Lands Dispositions Act

 On Thursday March 18 I spoke at second reading on  Bill  12 which deals with the sale or disposition of Crown Lands.  I was also able to ask several  questions  of  the  Minister. My comments  are below, and below my comments are my questions and  the Minister’s responses (from Hansard).

Bill 12–The Crown Land Dispositions Act

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights):  First of all, the minister has said during question period that the parks are not for sale. I raised the concern about the future–whether they could be for sale under these provisions in the future. I didn't get a clear answer for that, and that would have certainly been helpful.

      I asked the minister whether there would be any implications of this bill for the Crown land leases for agricultural purposes, which are causing a lot of stress for farmers at the moment, for producers in a number of parts of Manitoba. And the minister said, no, there would not. I await committee stage for further dis­cussion of that. I think that's something that we are concerned about and would want to know exactly what any implications were, if there were some.

      Third, I asked the minister about sales to close relatives in the document. In the bill itself it refers to senior civil servants. There is not a mention of close relatives, and I think that is something which we'd like to know more about.

      We do feel that it's really important to have–if you're going to sell Crown land–a really good process for valuation of that land, a fair valuation, that we don't have giveaways of land, that we have fair valua­tion of that land before decisions are made. This is important and, quite frankly, this presumably would be in regulation, but we'd like to have better assurance on that. We want to ensure that the process for any sale of Crown land is fair, that there's not queue-jumping, as it were, but that there's a reasonable process to make sure that Manitobans are treated fairly.

      Next, we're concerned about the stewardship of the land. We live in a world where we're very con­scious of things like climate change. We're very conscious of floods. We want and feel that there needs to be some sort of process incorporated–for example, sale of a land which has a small body of water on it–there should there be requirements in terms of stewardship of the land so that a large slough, for example, which is a large permanent water body, is not drained, to the detriment of landowners downstream.

      What about peatlands? We know that there's tremendous amounts of carbon in peatlands. Will there be requirements to ensure that there's reasonable stewardship of land? Where there are trees on the land–we know that if you completely remove trees from land, you remove a lot of stored carbon, but you also have an impact on the way that the water comes off the land, because there's no longer the trees to absorb the water that they need, and that can have a big impact. So we have some questions about steward­ship of the land.

      There is a lot about sale of the land, but it's not clear what happens in the case of transfer of Crown land to a rural municipality or a local government district, how that process will work in the context of this bill. This bill appears to remove the requirement for review by the department. We'd like to be a little bit more sure potential future government needs for land are taken into account, or potential needs for not just other departments but potential for the benefit of all Manitobans.

      So, with those few comments and concerns raised, I will close my remarks at this point and look forward to what's being said at the committee stage.

      Thank you. Merci.


Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): My question to the minister is this: will certain lands, for example, which are in provincial parks, would they be under the classification of Crown lands and could they be sold under this–the terms of this act? 

Hon. Reg Helwer (Minister of Central Services): Our parks are not for sale.

Mr. Gerrard: Yes. To the minister: the minister says that sales to senior civil servants will have to be approved by Cabinet. Will this 'appry' to all civil servants? Would this apply to close relatives of the senior civil servants so that the senior civil servant couldn't get around this by having a partner or a son purchase the property? What is the situation and what will the government do in these cases?

Mr. Helwer: Well, not everybody thinks about things in a sordid manner like some of the members in this Legislature; we do tend to trust our civil servants. But, of course, there was an Auditor General's report on the Hecla land sales.

      And we want to make sure that those types of things do not become replicated and that there is an over­sight to make sure that the sales are arm's length and that they are correct and they're–that they're well done in a timely fashion.


Mr. Gerrard: I'm trying to get an understanding how this relates to the policies that the government has done in terms of affecting Crown lands, which are being farmed by ranchers and–at the moment. And a number of them are having leases coming up very shortly–and will this affect, in any way, the position of such ranchers? 

Mr. Helwer: So this concerns sale of Crown lands that are be declared surplus, not leased land.


Mr. Gerrard: Yes. My question is, again, on the–who will be classified as a senior civil servant? Is there a clear–what level of civil servant would have to have a sale or purchase go through Cabinet?

Mr. Helwer: So the definitions of who is a civil servant, who is a senior civil servant and who will be subject to this is all in the act, and it's part of the other side of the department, which is the Civil Service Commission, on levels of the civil service.

      So, I think those designations are fairly obvious, but most senior civil servants know who they are and what their level of classification is. I think all of them do, actually.


Mr. Gerrard: Yes. To the minister, I'm just interested to know whether there are any special situations with regard to First Nations, Inuit or Métis people with regard to the disposal of Crown lands?  

Mr. Helwer: Absolutely, we are bound by treaty land entitlement, and we're very cognizant of that fact and we've done, I think, a very outstanding job in this government in making sure that if a land is–a Crown land is declared a surplus that goes through that procedure, that it can be selected for TLE.

      And the communication with First Nations com­munities for that is–has been working quite well, and we–the minister responsible for that would know much better than I how many acres of land has–have been transferred, but far more in the first couple of years we were in government than the previous govern­­ment ever did in 17 years.


Mr. Gerrard: I would ask the minister, what sort of extent of sale of surplus Crown lands would he expect to occur in the next year, two years and five years?

Mr. Helwer: Well, it's an excellent question, and we know what we have as an inventory of Crown land. We know that there are people that are interested in it. Those expressions of interest have been piling up as we've been moving through this process to make sure that it can be enabled and work in a timely manner. And we want to make sure that we get back to those individuals quickly with a good response so that they can determine how and when they can move ahead purchasing that land.

      The declaration of when something is surplus usually comes to the department that might be using that land, that may no longer feel the need for  it.


Mr. Gerrard: Just a follow-up on the–one question which I had earlier on. I asked about senior civil servants. Are close relatives affected in any way?

Mr. Helwer: That's an excellent question, and I think those types of things, the specifications, we need to be further into the bill and working with the department to make sure that we can make the member comfortable with how we make sure that our land sales are above board, that we don't have any Hecla issues, if you want to look at it that way, and that it's fully public and disclosed.


Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Manitoba Liberal accomplishments

  Examples of Manitoba Liberal accomplishments in the last three years Ensured that 2,000 Manitoba fishers were able to earn a living in 2020   (To see the full story click on this link ). Introduced a bill that includes retired teachers on the Pension Investment Board which governs their pension investments. Introduced amendments to ensure school aged children are included in childcare and early childhood education plans moving forward. Called for improvements in the management of the COVID pandemic: ·          We called for attention to personal care homes even before there was a single case in a personal care home. ·            We called for a rapid response team to address outbreaks in personal care homes months before the PCs acted.  ·          We called for a science-based approach to preparing schools to   improve ventilation and humidity long before the PCs acted. Helped hundreds of individuals with issues during the pandemic including those on social assistance

The Indigenous Science Conference in Winnipeg June 14-16

  June 14 to 16, I spent three days at the Turtle Island Indigenous Science Conference.  It was very worthwhile.   Speaker after speaker talked of the benefits of using both western or mainstream science and Indigenous science.  There is much we can learn from both approaches.   With me above is Myrle Ballard, one of the principal organizers of the conference.  Myrle Ballard, from Lake St. Martin in Manitoba, worked closely with Roger Dube a professor emeritus at Rochester Institute of Technology, and many others to make this conference, the first of its kind, a success.  As Roger Dube, Mohawk and Abenaki, a physicist, commented "My feeling is that the fusion of traditional ecological knowledge and Western science methodology should rapidly lead the researchers to much more holistic solutions to problems."   Dr. Myrle Ballard was the first person from her community to get a PhD.  She is currently a professor at the University of Manitoba and the Director of Indigenous Science