Skip to main content

The urgent need to address the outbreak of syphilis in Manitoba

 On Thursday March 11,  I asked in Question  Period about the current very worrisome outbreak of syphilis in Manitoba and the fact that there are  increasing numbers of newborns who are born with neonatal syphilis.  It is a  tragedy that the Pallister government has done so little to address this. As you can see from his response, Mr. Pallister pivots to blame the federal  government even when managing health care is a provincial  responsibility.  As a  provincial  Liberal  caucus, we would be  more than happy to join an all party group to  go to Ottawa provided the Pallister government was able to present an adequate plan to address critical issues like this, and to  give evidence  that new money would be effectively spent to achieve the objectives.   Sadly, Mr. Pallister pivots to the  federal government in a situation like this because he knows he has has not yet presented an adequate approach to ending the syphilis outbreak.   As an additional  point, the Premier is not correct that  federal support for health care this year is at its lowest level ever.

Deaths from Neonatal Syphilis
Prevention Resources Needed

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Madam Speaker, there's a major outbreak of syphilis in Manitoba, with the highest rates for syphilis and neo-natal syphilis of any province, and perhaps one of the highest in the world.

      Contact tracing for sexually transmitted diseases is short-staffed and less than needed. The latest report of the number of STDs in Manitoba is years behind. Why is the government hiding information?

      I ask: How many children have died from neo-natal syphilis? How many children will suffer the life-long consequences of congenital syphilis under this government's watch? And when will the government provide the desperately needed additional funding and resources to get syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia under control in our province?

Hon. Brian Pallister (Premier): Yes, the last three questions have highlighted a serious problem and concern we're actually addressing on a number of fronts, but I would emphasize to my Liberal col­leagues that they need to get on board with the NDP and the PC parties, and they need to get behind the call for their federal Liberal cousins to back health care in this country.

      They're calling for more funding from us, but they're not calling for the federal Liberals to provide more funding in a partnership with us. And there's an incongruity with that, I think, Madam Speaker, be­cause federal support for health care in our province has dropped to its lowest level ever in the history of Manitoba.

      So, I appreciate them raising the issues, I appre­ciate them calling for us to address them, but I'd like them to join in with the NDP and PC parties here and be part of the unified approach that's happening all across the country in every other province, with the exception of here in Manitoba, unfortunately, where the Liberal Party is not joining in and calling for the federal government to resume its rightful role, its responsible role in supporting programs like the very ones they just asked we address today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a