Skip to main content

Bill 53–The Municipal Statutes Amendment Act dealing with a municipal code of conduct and newspapers only publishing notices on their web sites

 On March 25, I spoke at second reading on Bill 53.   It provides for a code of conduct for municipal officials.   It also contains a provision that newspapers can meet the public notice requirements by putting public notices on their web pages instead of putting them in their newspapers.  Both of these provisions are poorly thought out as I discuss in my comments at second reading (from Hansard) - see below.  Bill  53 can be found by clicking on this link

Bill 53–The Municipal Statutes Amendment Act (2)

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): We have major concerns with the legislation as it is written. We feel that the approach to code of conduct is just wrong. It's analogous to saying that if there's a problem with somebody who has code of conduct in our Legislature, that the majority plus one is going to decide whether there's an issue. Well, of course. the majority plus one in the government would decide that there was never an issue if it was a government person, but if it was an opposition person, that it would be very quickly decided that there was a problem with their conduct.

      That is why, in this Legislature, we have a Conflict of Interest Commissioner who can deal with issues which come up. We have a process for dealing with concerns about harassment. This is not something to be decided by majority; it is something which should be decided by an independent, knowledgeable, capable individual, and that's why in our Legislature we have argued for an independent individual to manage harassment complaints rather than to try and deal with them internally.

      So I think, as this is written, it is very bad. It makes it very easy for a majority on a council to go after a minority on a council and to cause a lot of problems for the minority. We have seen this happen in a number of cases in Manitoba. This is just not acceptable legislation or process. In fact, it is bad process.

      With regard to the notice in newspapers. I say to the MLA for Concordia, you are correct; the minister is wrong. Subject to subsection 1, do one, not two of the following: either put it twice in a local newspaper or other publication having general circulation in the municipality or post a notice prominently on the website of a newspaper. So what we will have is it's okay just to put it in a website, not to publish it in the print version. We feel that it's not very likely that most Manitobans will check their local municipal website on a regular basis for notices. You know, I use the Internet a lot. I don't regularly check the City of Winnipeg website for notices; I depend on a lot of other different ways.

      In fact, in today's world, I mean, what should be there is the requirement that if an individual would like, if he registers with the municipality, that that individual should be able to receive by email or text or both, notice of any municipal issues or meetings which come up. And that would be far more effective and would complement publishing this in a local newspaper, as it has been done and people are used to receiving notification. Putting it on a website is a poor way of letting people know.

       It is a good way of people finding information on occasion when they are searching, but it is not a good way of notifying people. And this, at least, should be–it's on a website and in a newspaper. But I believe it also needs to be brought into the modern world and allow for and facilitate the use of emails and texts to notify people.

      So those are my comments. This is very bad legislation, and we will do everything we can to not only oppose it, but to ensure that it is changed.

      Thank you.


Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that pre