Skip to main content

Minister Scott Fielding goes out of his way to minimize the role of the federal government.

 On Monday March 22, during consideration of a Supply motion (basically a motion by the Pallister government to allow it to spend in advance of the budget. I asked a question about the relative contribution of the federal government to the province's extra expenditures this last year as a result of the COVID pandemic.  From the exchange below you can see that the actual federal contribution this last year was to provide to the province about 45% of the money needed for the extra COVID related expenditures.  Scott Fielding, the Minister of Finance, tries to diminish this by suggesting the proportion is only 20% when he uses calculations which include the province's cuts to this years spending and the projected provincial spending in future years.   It should be noted that even the 45% actual number does not reflect the fact that the federal government contributes substantial health care and equalization dollars which are then included by the province as part of its 55% contribution to the extra COVID-19 related expenditures this year.  It would be better for cooperative federalism if the province more accurately acknowledged the federal contribution, and the importance of the federal-provincial partnership. 

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): My question to the minister is follow-up from one earlier on. In the mid-term report, the money from the federal govern­ment was $648 million. The minister said that this was 20 per cent of the extra expenditures, but in that same mid-year report, it says that the extra expenditures–total expenditure change on page 9 was $1.456 billion; the $648 million is actually about 45 per cent, not just 20 per cent. Would the minister agree with that correction?

Mr. Fielding: No, I don't, unfortunately. So if you look at the mid-year report with–it identifies in this fiscal year, as of the mid-term report, is that we made about $1.8 billion of expenditures for things like health, education, supports for people as well as businesses. The reason why the number of expendi­tures goes to 1.4 is because there's some savings in other departments; that monies was not spent. The $3.2 billion represents additional expendi­tures that go into other years, whether that be things like capital expenditures which we committed over a two-year period.

      So the money that was negotiated by our Premier (Mr. Pallister) with the other premiers, with the Prime Minister and the federal government is very much needed, but only represents about 20 per cent of our spend of the 3.2.


Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

I cried today when I heard the report on the Maples Care Home disaster

Today the Pallister  government released the report on the tragedy which occurred at the Maples personal care home in October  to December 2020.   There were far too many people infected with COVID-19 (73 staff and 157 residents) and far too many deaths (56).  It did not have to be this way.  The central finding of the report was: "The review found that while pandemic plans had  been prepared and were in place, the site was not prepared for the significant reduction in available staff once they had been  exposed to COVID-19  and were required to self-isolate.  In addition, the urgency of requests for additional on-site staffing supports were not  fully understood until the situation became critical.   While additional staff were brought in, many were not skilled in providing long-term care services and  lacked training in infection prevention and control and specialized housekeeping skills."    Five  months before, Manitoba Liberals had warned the Premier three times that pre