Skip to main content

Minister Scott Fielding goes out of his way to minimize the role of the federal government.

 On Monday March 22, during consideration of a Supply motion (basically a motion by the Pallister government to allow it to spend in advance of the budget. I asked a question about the relative contribution of the federal government to the province's extra expenditures this last year as a result of the COVID pandemic.  From the exchange below you can see that the actual federal contribution this last year was to provide to the province about 45% of the money needed for the extra COVID related expenditures.  Scott Fielding, the Minister of Finance, tries to diminish this by suggesting the proportion is only 20% when he uses calculations which include the province's cuts to this years spending and the projected provincial spending in future years.   It should be noted that even the 45% actual number does not reflect the fact that the federal government contributes substantial health care and equalization dollars which are then included by the province as part of its 55% contribution to the extra COVID-19 related expenditures this year.  It would be better for cooperative federalism if the province more accurately acknowledged the federal contribution, and the importance of the federal-provincial partnership. 

Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): My question to the minister is follow-up from one earlier on. In the mid-term report, the money from the federal govern­ment was $648 million. The minister said that this was 20 per cent of the extra expenditures, but in that same mid-year report, it says that the extra expenditures–total expenditure change on page 9 was $1.456 billion; the $648 million is actually about 45 per cent, not just 20 per cent. Would the minister agree with that correction?

Mr. Fielding: No, I don't, unfortunately. So if you look at the mid-year report with–it identifies in this fiscal year, as of the mid-term report, is that we made about $1.8 billion of expenditures for things like health, education, supports for people as well as businesses. The reason why the number of expendi­tures goes to 1.4 is because there's some savings in other departments; that monies was not spent. The $3.2 billion represents additional expendi­tures that go into other years, whether that be things like capital expenditures which we committed over a two-year period.

      So the money that was negotiated by our Premier (Mr. Pallister) with the other premiers, with the Prime Minister and the federal government is very much needed, but only represents about 20 per cent of our spend of the 3.2.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive
3 comments
Read more

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations
18 comments
Read more

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  
Post a Comment
Read more