Skip to main content

PC's Letter Telling Municipalities to Lay Off Workers During Pandemic is Beyond Irresponsible


On Friday April 17th, we learned that the Pallister government has written to municipalities to give them advice about cutbacks which the Pallister government believes they should consider implementing.  Our press release (below) responded to this letter.  
WINNIPEG - Manitoba Liberals say the Pallister Government's decision to suggest municipalities lay people off is beyond irresponsible. After public health, the single greatest priority for governments must be saving the economy and doing everything they can to make sure that people keep their jobs.
Not only is Manitoba the only province to provide no direct financial assistance to people or businesses, but they are choosing to make unemployment and pay cuts worse while urging others to do the same.
The PCs plans to layoff or reduce work for public service will do terrible harm to Manitoba's economy. It means Manitoba customers will have less money to spend at Manitoba businesses. Even more critically, less money to pay their rent and mortgages.
"This is like having an arsonist in charge of the fire department," said Dougald Lamont, Manitoba Liberal Leader and MLA for St. Boniface. "Just two days ago, the legislature voted to give the government $1-billion in new spending and $5-billion in new borrowing powers, and that very day they were asking for more cuts."
Even as Manitoba is facing record unemployment and business losses, the Pallister government is choosing to go out of its way to make the situation worse. Cuts and layoffs means adding to the ranks of the unemployed and the people who cannot pay their bills.
There is no need for austerity. Manitoba Liberals recognize that municipalities in particular cannot borrow, and have called on the Federal Government and Bank of Canada to step up with funding for provincial and municipal governments.
"While some federal participation is essential, we have to say that it is disgraceful that we have to call on the Federal Government for help because the Pallister government won't lift a finger," said Lamont.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a