Skip to main content

The Pallister Government Must Suspend Cutting Off Services for Vulnerable Youth Who Age-Out


On Friday April 3, we raised concerns about youth who are vulnerable and the need to make sure their critical supports are continued even when they turn age out of current supports.  Our Press Release is below:
 WINNIPEG - Manitoba Liberals say no one who is vulnerable should have their supports cut off during the pandemic just because they turn 18.
Dougald Lamont, MLA for St. Boniface, and Leader of the Manitoba Liberal Party, said the Pallister Government should suspend the practice of canceling supports for vulnerable people and families when people "age out" of care.
Examples of "aging out" that happen under the current system include:
- Support payments to children in the child welfare system who are turning 18 or 21
- Supports for families and children with disabilities are often eliminated when the young person turns 18
- People with Type 1 diabetes supports for insulin pumps for when they turn 18. Manitoba is the only province that doesn't cover insulin pumps for people of all ages.
"No one who is vulnerable should have their supports cut off during the pandemic just because they turn 18," said Lamont.
The Manitoba Advocate for Children and Youth support the same calls as The Child Welfare League of Canada, A Way Home Canada, and The Children's Aid Foundation of Canada made last week. Manitoba Liberals echo the same calls for the Pallister Government to immediately:
• Indefinitely suspend legislated age cut-offs for youth reaching the age of majority
• Provide free, accessible mental health services and maintain family and cultural connections for youth in and from care
• Reach out to those who have recently transitioned out of care and offer additional supports for their survival, with no eligibility criteria or conditions attached
• Not turn away youth seeking housing and services
Manitoba Liberals say with so much economic uncertainty and layoffs, it would be completely irresponsible to allow youth receiving needed government supports to stop receiving them at this time.
"The pandemic should not be a government's excuse to do less. It is more important than ever, when people are losing their supports at this time, for the government to keep the supports it provides in place," said Lamont.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a