Skip to main content

The Pallister Government Must Suspend Cutting Off Services for Vulnerable Youth Who Age-Out


On Friday April 3, we raised concerns about youth who are vulnerable and the need to make sure their critical supports are continued even when they turn age out of current supports.  Our Press Release is below:
 WINNIPEG - Manitoba Liberals say no one who is vulnerable should have their supports cut off during the pandemic just because they turn 18.
Dougald Lamont, MLA for St. Boniface, and Leader of the Manitoba Liberal Party, said the Pallister Government should suspend the practice of canceling supports for vulnerable people and families when people "age out" of care.
Examples of "aging out" that happen under the current system include:
- Support payments to children in the child welfare system who are turning 18 or 21
- Supports for families and children with disabilities are often eliminated when the young person turns 18
- People with Type 1 diabetes supports for insulin pumps for when they turn 18. Manitoba is the only province that doesn't cover insulin pumps for people of all ages.
"No one who is vulnerable should have their supports cut off during the pandemic just because they turn 18," said Lamont.
The Manitoba Advocate for Children and Youth support the same calls as The Child Welfare League of Canada, A Way Home Canada, and The Children's Aid Foundation of Canada made last week. Manitoba Liberals echo the same calls for the Pallister Government to immediately:
• Indefinitely suspend legislated age cut-offs for youth reaching the age of majority
• Provide free, accessible mental health services and maintain family and cultural connections for youth in and from care
• Reach out to those who have recently transitioned out of care and offer additional supports for their survival, with no eligibility criteria or conditions attached
• Not turn away youth seeking housing and services
Manitoba Liberals say with so much economic uncertainty and layoffs, it would be completely irresponsible to allow youth receiving needed government supports to stop receiving them at this time.
"The pandemic should not be a government's excuse to do less. It is more important than ever, when people are losing their supports at this time, for the government to keep the supports it provides in place," said Lamont.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being able to participate matters - Let’s build a more inclusive, accessible Manitoba

Too often, our homes, buildings, and outdoor spaces are designed without sufficient consideration given to how they will impact little people, those with large bodies, or those with disabilities.  Manitoba should become a leader in designing and building new structures so they’re comfortable and accessible to all.  Further, the province needs to do more to adapt our existing infrastructure, so that it meets everyone’s needs.   The design of our built environment makes daily living a challenge for too many.  A friend, who uses a wheelchair, must call ahead wherever she goes to ensure she can enter a restaurant, store, salon, etc. A young person in River Heights has a struggle each fall to make sure that with his cerebral palsy he is able to get the support he needs to do well in school.  A large-bodied man I know has been bedridden for five months because he lacks access to a usable lift or wheelchair.  Samantha Trubyk, President of the Little People ...

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Debating the importance of the french language, education in french and french services in Manitoba

Thursday, May 17, we had a debate on a resolution on french language education and french language services in the Manitoba.   The debate arose because the Pallister government has made major cutbacks in french language education.  In part these cuts have reduced the status and funding for   le Bureau de l'éducation française which is the division of the Department of Education which deals with education in french.   Several items are notable:  The Pallister Conservatives block a motion to have the normal full hour of debate.   Hon. Jon  Gerrard  (River Heights):  I have a question. Before I ask it, this is a pretty important subject and I'd like to have leave to make sure that we have a full hour of debate, and so the debate would go 'til about 12:15. Mr. Deputy Speaker:  Has there been leave to go to 12:15? An Honourable Member:  Agreed. An Honourable Member:  No. Mr. Deputy Speaker:  N...