Skip to main content

Methamphetamine Crisis - the Health Minister has been blocking progress


Sadly there has been little progress in addressing the meth crisis in Manitoba in the last two years. I asked, in Question Period, why the Minister of Health was blocking progress.  My question and the Premier's response are in the video at this link, and in the text below:


Methamphetamine Crisis - Progress Concerns


Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights):
      Yesterday, the Canadian Institute for Health Information released a report that states that wait times for hip, knee and cataract surgery are getting longer under this government's watch. We have a meth crisis, and we've had it for two years that this Pallister government has been there.
      Of all things, Madam Speaker, the very person who is now in charge of health care, the Minister of Health–he went around the province learning about meth addiction–he has been blocking progress for two years.
      I ask the minister: Why has he blocked progress on the meth crisis for two years?

Hon. Brian Pallister (Premier): Well, we've now learned, according to the member for River Heights, the meth crisis began and was caused by the Minister of Health, Madam Speaker.
      Madam Speaker, this is the pathetic preamble that we have to listen to in respect of the Liberal position here in Manitoba. It's Ottawa-west. That's all it is; that's all, apparently, it's going to be. And  that's unfortunate because yesterday we had a good  conversation in Estimates. The member for Concordia (Mr. Wiebe) spoke supportively of a position of the official opposition in joining with us to oppose Liberal cuts to health care. I appreciated that. I thank the opposition for taking that position.

Some Honourable Members: Oh, oh.
Madam Speaker: Order. Order.

Mr. Pallister: Now, Madam Speaker, we can join together. We can join together in this House, oppose a reduction of $2.2 billion from our health-care budget over the next decade. If only the member for River Heights and his beleaguered Liberal-west mini-team would join us, we'd have unanimity here in the House, and we could get these cuts and push them back and support Manitobans with better health care.
      All of us should join together and do that,  including the member for River Heights. It's never too late to turn over a new leaf, show a new side and get behind health care for Manitobans.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  

Dougald Lamont speaks out strongly against the "reprehensible", "legally and morally indefensible" Bill 2

 Early in the morning, just after 3 am, on November 6th, Dougald Lamont spoke at third reading of Bill 2, the Budget Implementation and Statutes Amendment Act.  He spoke strongly against the bill because it attempts to legitimize a historic injustice against children in the care of child and family services.  As  Dougald says this bill is " the betrayal of children, First Nations and the people of this province. " Mr. Dougald  Lamont  (St. Boniface):   These are historic times. This is an  historic budget, for all the wrong reasons.  I was thinking of the Premier's (Mr. Pallister) comments about D-Day today and my relatives who served in combat in the First and Second World War. I had a relative who played for the Blue Bombers and served at D-Day with the Winnipeg Rifles because he was an excellent athlete, he made it quite a long way up the beach.       And had he lived until last year, he might have been one of the veterans the Premier insulted by not showing up at a