Skip to main content

Wetlands Stewardship and Climate Change

On Tuesday April 3, I spoke on a resolution addressing wetlands to discuss the role of our stewardship of wetlands in addressing climate change and the need for a great deal more research to be able to validate claims related to climate storage in wetlands. My comments are below.  Beneath my comments is a copy of the original resolution.
Hon. Jon Gerrard (River Heights): Mr. Speaker, just a few comments on this resolution.
      First of all, I'm pleased to note that there is strong support for looking at wetlands for plans for wetlands, that there's a recognition in this resolution, for example, that Manitoba has lost up to 70 per cent of its wetlands in southern–I think that would apply to southwestern as well as southeastern Manitoba. I think there's areas where those numbers are probably low and it may be higher, but the direct consequence of that loss of wetlands has been increased flooding, has been flooding not only of farmland but flooding of communities, flooding in many parts of Manitoba. So it is important that we are paying attention to this.
      I note that the resolution includes a recognition that there is a continuing loss of wetlands at the rate of nine acres per day, and it would seem to me that this government has been in power now for two years, that we have not seen as high a priority as we should have in this area. We have not seen the action. There's no evidence that the rate of loss of wetlands has decreased at all, and so I'm pleased that we have this resolution but I'm disappointed in the performance so far of the current government.
      I think it is important this resolution recognizes that we need to be considering agricultural areas, the prairie wetlands and we need to be considering the boreal forest. And the two are different enough that we're going to need different approaches, one in the agricultural area and a separate approach in the boreal forest. I think there is a significant potential with the right sort of planning to store significant amounts of carbon. I note that the member, in his resolution, talks about implementing a three-to-one ratio replacement policy for lost wetlands; I presume that's three acres of wetlands for every one that is lost. The member is nodding his head. And that is important that we have a plan that can actually achieve that because that is a significant goal, it's important, and we will support this resolution because it speaks to the importance of wetlands and doing a lot better stewardship than we have in the past.
      I want to note as well that being able to start counting the storage of carbon in wetlands, there are, as in other areas, there are positive effects in storing and there are negative things which could lead to loss of those stores in wetlands. And so one of the things that we need is much more activity than we have at the moment, in research, on the storage of carbons in Manitoba-based wetlands so that we can validate any claims that we have for carbon storage in moving forward.
      We also need significant research in our boreal forest because, once again, it is not just a question of storage but also of loss in terms of carbon. You know, for example, as we're all too aware that we have fires in our boreal forest, and so, on one hand, we have carbon stored in trees, and the other hand, we have carbon going up in the atmosphere with fires. And we need to know how the balance worked; we need to know how to exert proper stewardship of peat bogs and wetlands of all courses.
      And so it is vital that we have very substantial investments in research to be able to validate the approach that we're taking in terms of storage of carbon, and that validation then can then be used in whether it's getting carbon credits or offsetting. Right now, the current way we have of accounting for carbon dioxide and other nitrous oxide and methane generation doesn't adequately allow us to capture the storage of carbon. And so we need to make sure that we're moving forward in our accounting process for carbon, and so that in fact we can, if we were able to move to being carbon neutral, get credit for that and make sure that we have all the evidence to back that up.
      So, Mr. Speaker, I will sit down now so that hopefully we can have a vote on this resolution, which I think we should move forward.
      Tank you.
The Original Resolution put forward by Alan Lagimodiere
Mr. Alan Lagimodiere (Selkirk): I move, seconded by the member from Dauphin,
WHEREAS wetlands help to prevent flooding, store carbon and remove sediment, nutrients and contam­inants from waterways; and
WHEREAS wetlands contribute to safe water supplies for shallows and deep wells; and
WHEREAS wetland areas promote healthy eco­systems and biodiversity by supporting many forms of plant and animal life; and
WHEREAS Manitoba has lost up to 70% of wetlands in southern Manitoba and continues to lose wetlands at a rate of nine acres per day; and
WHEREAS other jurisdictions in North America have implemented a three to one ratio replacement policy for lost wetland areas; and
WHEREAS the Provincial Government has fully committed to reducing flooding and improving water quality and nutrient management through the Grow program; and
WHEREAS prairie wetlands in Manitoba store approximately 67 million tonnes of carbon; and
WHEREAS Manitoba's boreal region is rich in wetlands, store as much as 27.9 billion tonnes of carbon, and provide a critical habitat for species at risk such as boreal woodland caribou.
      That the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba urge the provincial government to continue to acknowl­edge the need to protect wetlands and to strive to replace damaged or lost wetland areas in order to halt their depletion and ensure the ongoing health of one of Manitoba's most essential ecosystems.

The resolution was debated for an hour.   At the end of the hour, the NDP chose to continue the debate rather than allowing a vote on the resolution.  The tradition is that if the opposition NDP supported the resolution, they would let it come to a vote.  They did not and so the presumption is that the NDP did not support it.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

Premier Pallister is wrong when he says no one could have predicted the speed and severity of the second wave

Premier Brian Pallister is just wrong in saying yesterday that "Nobody could have predicted the degree to which COVID came fast."  He was referring to the speed and severity of the COVID-19 virus spreading this fall in Manitoba.   Contrary to what the Premier says, many people were predicting the Second Wave of the pandemic  would  be worse than the first.  Historically this has often happened with pandemics in the past.  In Manitoba in 2009 the H1N1 pandemic was worse in the second wave than during the first wave.  The speed of the pandemic was not a surprise.  COVID-19 infections are well known to rise exponentially when adequate containment measures are not in place.   In jurisdictions like Italy and New York as well as elsewhere we had examples of sudden explosions of cases when the spread of the virus was increasing exponentially.  There was already evidence to suggest that the virus would be worse in winter months, and that spread would be faster as people moved indoors