Skip to main content

Why is the government of Manitoba not fully endorsing the Treatment is Prevention approach to HIV-AIDS


British Columbia has used a treatment as prevention approach to HIV-AIDS which has been very successful in reducing the number of new cases of HIV-AIDS in B.C.   Manitoba has not acted and the number of cases in Manitoba has remained stable and not decreased.  I asked the Minister of Health in Estimates on April 24 about this.

Mr. Gerrard: British Columbia, for a number of years, has taken the approach that treatment of HIV/AIDS is prevention, because current treatment is able to drastically lower the viral load so that people are no longer infectious. We have a considerable number of Manitobans with AIDS who can't afford the treatment. And it has been recommended for a number of years that the treatment for HIV/AIDS be covered completely so that–by the Manitoba Health in order to prevent the spread of HIV/AIDS in Manitoba. In contrast to BC, where the–there's been a dramatic reduction in HIV/AIDS, the incidence has been relatively stable in Manitoba. Is the minister going to take any action on this?

Mr. Goertzen: So the member raises an important issue when it comes to HIV. He's right, I believe, that the rates in Manitoba have remained relatively stable. Of course, we'd always like to see improvements on that.

      One of the things that was recently announced, though I don't know that it got a lot of, sort of, public attention, but the–an agreement–bilateral agreement for information sharing with the federal government–the member–I want to disavow him of any idea that I don't give credit where credit is due when it comes to the federal government. We worked together to sign an information-sharing agreement with the federal government in terms of it's called the Panorama program and that's to ensure that information is properly shared, which can have an impact on communicable diseases in the province.

      So what was happening prior to the agreement–of course, we're still in the implementation of it–is that the health information for those who were, for example, living off-reserve, wasn't always available to those who were working on-reserve and vice versa. So we wanted to ensure that–for vaccines, as an example, if you got a vaccine off-reserve or in a non‑federal jurisdiction, that that information would be available in the federal jurisdiction, on-reserve, and likewise if you got a vaccination on-reserve that if you were going outside the–into the reserve system, that that information would be provided as well off-reserve so to make the information flow between those two jurisdictions. Previously, that information wasn't shared.

      So there was good work done by department officials over the last couple of years in terms of negotiating the agreement so that we could share that information. It's not unlike the information-sharing agreement that we would have with the RHAs, the regional health authorities, to ensure that there is information, that it flows between the RHAs for Manitobans who are accessing care. And now the similar agreement is in place so that those who are   on-reserve or off-reserve are–can have that information shared so that when we're dealing with issues like communicable diseases, there's much better information. So, good news, recent news, and I'm pleased to provide that to the committee.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations
18 comments
Read more

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Being able to participate matters - Let’s build a more inclusive, accessible Manitoba

Too often, our homes, buildings, and outdoor spaces are designed without sufficient consideration given to how they will impact little people, those with large bodies, or those with disabilities.  Manitoba should become a leader in designing and building new structures so they’re comfortable and accessible to all.  Further, the province needs to do more to adapt our existing infrastructure, so that it meets everyone’s needs.   The design of our built environment makes daily living a challenge for too many.  A friend, who uses a wheelchair, must call ahead wherever she goes to ensure she can enter a restaurant, store, salon, etc. A young person in River Heights has a struggle each fall to make sure that with his cerebral palsy he is able to get the support he needs to do well in school.  A large-bodied man I know has been bedridden for five months because he lacks access to a usable lift or wheelchair.  Samantha Trubyk, President of the Little People ...
Post a Comment
Read more