Skip to main content

Eyeglasses for seniors - the Minister says it is only $50 he may be taking away

On Thursday June 21, I asked the Minister of Health about the provincial program which provides support for eyeglasses for seniors.   It was earmarked, in the KPMG report, along with "orthopedic shoes for children" to be cut.   I asked the Minister of Health about his plans for the program   My question and the Minister's response is below.   If you want to send a comment to the Minister of Health you can do so by writing to his email at minhsal@leg.gov.mb.ca
Mr. Gerrard: I'll just talk about another couple of recommendations.
      That recommendation for reducing the support for orthopedic shoes for children–this is a–you know, pretty important in terms of children being active, getting the exercise that we know that is so important for many things, including brain development and activity, including the prevention of diabetes, including reducing the risk of heart attacks. So developing good ability to walk, to move, to run and to make sure that all children have that opportunity seems to me pretty important. So I would just ask the minister, you know, about that program.
      And I would ask him also about the program which is eyeglasses for seniors, having looked and watched firsthand in terms of the importance of seniors being able to maintain their sight to the extent that they can, be able to have that sight to prevent them falling, which can be a major problem in seniors, to have that sight to be able to keep involved and avoid the loneliness that can certainly be a major problem for seniors and has been identified as such. So I would ask, maybe not the minister to comment on every program, but at least to give a brief comment on the orthopedic shoes for children and the eyeglasses for seniors programs.
Mr. Goertzen: Just for context for those who are  listening or might be reading Hansard, I–you know, the–I think the eyeglasses for seniors program provides a subsidy. It doesn't pay for the entire glasses. It's in the range of $50. I imagine that there's probably many Manitobans who don't even know that the program exists.
      
To learn more about the eyeglasses for seniors program go to this link.   As of June 26, 2018 it was still listed on the provincial government program as an active program. 

Comments

  1. I wish that the Minister in question would have a better understanding of the eyeglass program when he says that he doubt s that many people would even know about it. People who need glasses as prescribed by their eye doctor know about the program because the optometrist mentions the program to every client and at the store where the eyeglasses are sold, they tell you about the program. Perhaps the Minster gets his glasses elsewhere? It is a paltry sum that one receives and this is something that should be, and ought to be, included in our Health Care Act.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

  On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.