Skip to main content

What will be Manitoba's governance structure for mental health and addictions? Minister Goertzen won't say

Thursday June 21, I asked Minister of Health Kelvin Goertzen what he was planning for the governance structure for mental health and addictions?   My question and his response are below. 

Mr. Gerrard: The minister has recently tabled the VIRGO report. Among that–the recommendations is some discussion of a model for governance of mental health and addictions.
      I wonder if the minister could provide clarity on what his plans are with regard to the governance of mental health and addictions in Manitoba.
Mr. Goertzen: Sorry, I may have–thank you, Mr. Chairperson–may have missed the very first part of that question. I was being heckled from my own side, which sometimes happens in a parliamentary setting.
      I think he was asking, though, about the future of AFM or mental health governance.
Mr. Gerrard: Let me clarify.
      In the VIRGO report, which was brought forward by Dr. Rush, there is a specific discussion of the future of the governance of mental health and addictions province-wide.
      What is the vision that the minister has for the governance of mental health and addictions of province-wide?
Mr. Goertzen: I thank the member for the question.
      And I think for too long–and this was part of the impetus of the VIRGO report and our government's commitment on mental health and addiction, that they've–that these have worked in silos in the past. And I don't think that they were developed that way because people thought it was better for them to work in silos. But I think that there's been a lot of focus in the last 15, 20 years on mental health, a lot of good focus in terms of awareness–far less stigma associated with it, although there's more to do, of course, on that front.
      And I think there's a greater recognition that there's a correlation between mental health and addictions. I think I read somewhere there was 60  per cent or more than that of those who were dealing with a mental health issue had also–were either currently or had dealt with an addictions issue. So there's a strong correlation between the two.
      You know, I–we believe that the governance should happen through Shared Health. The exact method of that, I think, has yet to be determined. I would believe that addictions and mental health will be co-ordinated largely through Shared Health, but then delivered at a local level.
      I think I shared with the member before–or, maybe with another member in the House, maybe the member for Assiniboia (Mr. Fletcher), that when it comes to addictions, I think we need to look at different models.
      Certainly, government will always and should always play a role when it comes to the delivery of services in addictions, but I don't think we do enough to tap organizations who are invested and want to invest in doing more treatment, whether that day treatment or longer term treatment, when it comes to addictions.
      I recently was in Minnesota and had the opportunity to speak to some folks down there. I know that in the States, they have a good reputation when it comes to the delivery of addiction services. And, to a large extent, their standards exist within the statute in Minnesota, and they measure outcomes against that statute, and they commission services, some within government and many not within government, against that statute.
      And one of the challenges that I've found as Minister of Health on this particular part of the file is that we didn't have a method to–if we were commissioning out services, we didn't have a method to judge those who might be applying in to provide services from a non-profit perspective.
      And so I think we've essentially developed a method now to be able to–if we decided to do an RFP on certain services, to actually be able to measure that against a standard to ensure that the right service is being provided. And that didn't exist before, because I think the model of care was probably mostly government-centred, and I think we need to move beyond that.
Mr. Gerrard: Yes. I would take that a little bit further. In terms of what the minister envisions, is there going to be, you know, a single individual within Shared Health who's responsible? Is there going to be a committee? Is there going to be a board, or is there–you know, what structure is there going to be in terms of who is responsible for mental health and addictions?
      Will the minister be making at some point an announcement about who and what sort of organizational approach the–is going to be taken?
Mr. Goertzen: Yes.
Mr. Gerrard: That was one of the shortest answers I've had. Good, we will await that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

Premier Pallister is wrong when he says no one could have predicted the speed and severity of the second wave

Premier Brian Pallister is just wrong in saying yesterday that "Nobody could have predicted the degree to which COVID came fast."  He was referring to the speed and severity of the COVID-19 virus spreading this fall in Manitoba.   Contrary to what the Premier says, many people were predicting the Second Wave of the pandemic  would  be worse than the first.  Historically this has often happened with pandemics in the past.  In Manitoba in 2009 the H1N1 pandemic was worse in the second wave than during the first wave.  The speed of the pandemic was not a surprise.  COVID-19 infections are well known to rise exponentially when adequate containment measures are not in place.   In jurisdictions like Italy and New York as well as elsewhere we had examples of sudden explosions of cases when the spread of the virus was increasing exponentially.  There was already evidence to suggest that the virus would be worse in winter months, and that spread would be faster as people moved indoors