NDP - Tory Debate over who is best at breaking promises

Thursday June 7th, NDP MLA Mr. Altemeyer and Conservative MLA Ms Squires debated over who was the best at breaking promises. The transcript from Hansard is below:

Mr. Rob Altemeyer (Wolseley): A question for the Premier (Mr. Pallister), if I may.

Last year, this Premier and his government made a promise to Manitoba's fishers. The promise was that they would be paid within seven days of the fisher making a sale of their product to a fish dealer. Four fishing communities found out the hard way that that promise wasn't worth the paper it was written on.

Why did the Premier break his promise to the fishers in Eddystone, Dawson Bay, Waterhen and Ashern?

Hon. Rochelle Squires (Minister of Sustainable Development): You know, I reject the entire preamble and the false assertions in this member's question.

What I know about breaking promises, though, is that the NDP had made a promise to our House leader, the member for Spruce Woods (Mr. Cullen), and they broke it. That is what a broken promise is. Our government keeps its promises.

Comments

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it. The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives. The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support). It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March. South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory. The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions. This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14. Manitoba ( red line ) started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then. South Dakota ( blue line ) has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4. Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Pushing for safe consumption sites and safe supply to reduce overdose deaths

On Monday June 20th, Thomas Linner of the Manitoba Health Coalition, Arlene Last-Kolb Regional Director of Moms Stop the Harm and Winnipeg City Councillor Sherri Rollins were at the Manitoba Legislature to advocate for better measures to reduce deaths from drug overdoses, most particularly for safe consumption sites and for a safe supply, measures which can reduce overdose deaths.

The Gerrard Report

Search This Blog