Skip to main content

Supporting public transit in Manitoba


Thursday June 7th, in the Manitoba Legislature, we debated a resolution dealing with public transit and its funding.   The Conservatives and NDP spent much of the time trying to argue that the other party was worse than they were when it came to public transit.   My comments (from Hansard) are below:

Mr. Gerrard: Mr. Speaker, thank you for the opportunity to speak to this important resolution.
      We've seen, in the last few days and now, today, NDP and Tories arguing in one way or another. Today, it's about who's done worse when it comes to public transit in Winnipeg and in Manitoba. But what is lacking is the broader perspective of why public transit is so critical and what the vision and the planning is for public transit for Winnipeg and for Manitoba.
      Public transit and its support are really vital and central to our future as Winnipeggers and as Manitobans. Rapid transit is especially important. And public transit is important particularly to students, to low-income families, to seniors, to people with disabilities, to those who are unable to drive. For example, I was talking recently with people who are concerned about those with epilepsy and seizures and who are unable to drive a car.  People who can't drive a car need to have access to really good public transit.
      Tourism–to have a top-notch tourist location in Winnipeg. We have many wonderful attractions, but you compare us to other major cities, we don't have the kind of rapid transit that's available to people coming to most major cities in the world - that gets tourists to where they need to go to, or want to go to, very quickly.
      Certainly, they're opportunities that we need to embrace and to work toward. Getting access to health care, to jobs, to services [is important]   The current government is closing emergency rooms, but they forgot that the cities that they compared Winnipeg to,  like Vancouver, who have fewer emergency rooms, have a rapid transit system that people can get access to places like emergency rooms very quickly, whereas here, there is not that same rapid transit where you can get to where you need to go for health care very quickly if you're sick.
      And so we have a different circumstance [in Winnipeg]. The government should have been putting in place the rapid transit system before doing this sort of fast closure of emergency rooms. It [closing the ERs] certainly created a lot of chaos and a lot of problems, and this aspect wasn't adequately considered.
      We need a city where it's much easier to live without a car and, you know, more possible, and more people do it. I remember going to school–medical school at McGill University. I was there for four years in Montreal, and it was very easy to get around because they had a rapid transit system built and developed. Quite frankly, a person didn't need a car. And it's hard to say the same thing in the same way about Winnipeg because there's not the adequate, city-wide rapid transit system that other large cities have.
      We need to recognize that rapid transit, fully developed and fully city-wide, is, in fact, the backbone for people travelling in large cities in today's world.
      And it is not only the backbone for how people travel; it's also the backbone for how the city develops, how planning happens for a city. You would put in place, normally, the backbone and then have a development plan. Successive NDP and Conservative governments have failed to make sure that that city-wide rapid transit system was in place, and so we don't have the backbone and it makes it more difficult to have a Winnipeg plan–a plan Winnipeg, which is based on a strong backbone to start with.
      The backbone provides, as I've already talked, much easier access and much easier visiting for people who are from outside of Winnipeg, and that would apply to people who come from rural areas. Somebody who comes from rural areas will now, if they have a car, automatically take a car and drive it all over Winnipeg. If there was rapid transit what happens in other jurisdictions is that people park on the outskirts of the city, get into rapid transit and they don't need to be tied up in traffic jams and things like that. They have easy access all over the city.
      This is what's happening elsewhere, but it's not happening here because we don't have that fully completed and functional rapid transit system for Winnipeg. It is important for people who are flying in from the North. As an option, it makes it a lot easier to get all over the city very quickly to where you need to go. It would be a big difference. It makes a big difference for people coming in from outside of Winnipeg. It makes a big difference because all of a sudden it's very easy for people to get to the Museum for Human Rights or other attractions–the Convention Centre, wherever people want to go and particularly for meetings, and experience the wonderful things that we have in Winnipeg and in Manitoba.
      Winnipeg can be even more of a hub with this sort of development than it is now, and I should add that having adequate public transit in communities around Manitoba is also important. Being connected and having the public transit so that you can get where you need to go in communities like Brandon and many other communities in Manitoba would be and is very, very important.
      In the development of the plan, we need to consider many things and make sure that we are consulting and talking with people who will be involved from all perspectives in the changes that will occur. But I don't see that happening with this government or the previous government. We need to take hold of this concept and make sure that the vision and the plan for rapid transit are there for people in Winnipeg and for the people in Manitoba so that whether you're a senior, whether you're a student, whether you're a tourist, whether you're a developer, you have an understanding of what's going to be happening in Winnipeg and Manitoba in the future.
      We've debated rapid transit for 30 or 40 years in Winnipeg and we still haven't got it. We need action; we need a plan. We think that the current government in their activities in cutting transit is taking us backward instead of taking us forward. We think we need to go forward, Mr. Speaker, and make sure that we are thinking about what the future will be, what we can do in our wonderful city and our wonderful province. We need to be acting and planning and talking with people about what the vision for the future is and what the plan for the future is.
      And so debating about who is the worst in rapid transit is–shouldn't be on the agenda. What should be on the agenda today is talking about what we really need in terms of a better world for Winnipeg and for Manitoba in terms of better public support and provincial support for rapid transit, a vision that will help all of us and create a better, more equitable and healthier society.
      Thank you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations

Standing up for Seniors

Yesterday in the Legislature I  asked the Minister of Health questions about the care of seniors in personal care homes in Manitoba.   I specfically called for the Minister to increase the training and staffing requirements for personal care homes in Manitoba to bring them up to date.   My questions, the Minister's comments and the Speaker's interjection are below:  Personal-Care-Home  Improvements - Need for Upgrades to Standards and Training Hon. Jon  Gerrard   (River Heights): Madam Speaker, we're very concerned this government is not adapting to the reality of caring for seniors who are living longer. Seniors living in our personal-care homes today have much more challenging health-care conditions than those who were in similar homes even five years ago, and yet the staffing formula, or minimal personnel requirement, is over 20 years old. Too few care aides and nurses are adequately trained to look after residents with dementia and multiple chronic health conditi

Premier Pallister is wrong when he says no one could have predicted the speed and severity of the second wave

Premier Brian Pallister is just wrong in saying yesterday that "Nobody could have predicted the degree to which COVID came fast."  He was referring to the speed and severity of the COVID-19 virus spreading this fall in Manitoba.   Contrary to what the Premier says, many people were predicting the Second Wave of the pandemic  would  be worse than the first.  Historically this has often happened with pandemics in the past.  In Manitoba in 2009 the H1N1 pandemic was worse in the second wave than during the first wave.  The speed of the pandemic was not a surprise.  COVID-19 infections are well known to rise exponentially when adequate containment measures are not in place.   In jurisdictions like Italy and New York as well as elsewhere we had examples of sudden explosions of cases when the spread of the virus was increasing exponentially.  There was already evidence to suggest that the virus would be worse in winter months, and that spread would be faster as people moved indoors