Skip to main content

We must stop the Pallister government from implementing the KPMG proposed cuts to children's hearing aids, bone-anchored hearing implant processors and FM transmitters.

The Phase II report from KPMG on the Health System Sustainability and Innovation Review makes a recommendation that the government decrease the level of provincial support for children's hearing aids, for bone-implant processors and FM transmitters.    These are devices which are very important for enabling children with hearing difficulties to hear.   We have recently (2016) finally achieved universal newborn hearing screening after many years of advocating for this.   It is essential that children who are identified at birth as hearing deficient have the support for enable them to hear as good as they can hear with the support of hearing aids and Cochlear implants.  When children have a hearing deficiency, they have difficulty hearing and this translates into difficulties learning and often to behavioural and other problems down the road.  We need to ensure that these children are enabled to do well.   The provincial government should definitely not reduce support for this program.   Any costs which are saved will just result in more provincial health, education, child welfare and justice costs down the road.  Please email the Minister of Health to support this program and stop it from being cut.  I raised this issue in the Manitoba Legislature on Thursday June 21.   It appears the Minister has not yet made a final decision, and that if there are enough people writing in to him, the program can be saved.  Thank you for helping. The Minister of Health, Senior's and Active Living email is

Mr. Gerrard: One of the parts that was on the KPMG report that has been raising concerns and people have been communicating with me about is the cutbacks  that are suggested, and I will list one of them. This is in personal audiology equipment, specifically children's hearing aids, bone-anchored hearing‑implant processors and FM transmitters.
      Now, as the minister knows, and we've already talked earlier on, we now have a universal newborn hearing screening program. And, you know, it is really, really important that the kids who are identified as having hearing deficiencies can get those hearing deficiencies addressed, and that includes making sure that these equipments, including children's hearing aids and so on, are available and that these are going to be supported.
      The fact is that the development of a child's brain is such that if a child can be helped to hear properly early on, they can learn language, their brain can develop, they can do well in school. But all too often in the past, children who were missed, they didn't develop language properly, they developed learning problems, and they have had, you know, lifelong difficulties as a result.
      So we're talking about something that can make a lifetime difference for a child, and that lifetime difference is not only for that child. The extra expense of, you know, helping a child whose hearing problem has developed into a learning disability is very substantial. And that extra expense deals with the support that may be necessary in schools. The school costs as well as health-care costs could impact Justice costs and so on.
      So what I'm asking for from the minister is an update on what his plans are with regard to the KPMG recommendation that the support for personal audiology equipment, specifically children's hearing aids, bone-anchored hearing-implement processors–implant processors and FM transmitters, would be  reduced. Is he going to follow the KPMG recommendations, or is he going to reject this recommendation and make sure that children in this province are properly supported?
Mr. Chairperson: The honourable minister for Health, Seniors and Active Living.
Mr. Goertzen: Thank–Madam–or Mr. Chairperson. Sorry.
      One of the challenges with being the most transparent government in Canada and releasing, you know, all these–the different reports is exactly this, of course. You know, so, within any report, you won't always accept everything, and I think that there probably isn't a government around that has accepted every recommendation of every report that they've ever received in government.
      But the KPMG report, of course, has many different suggestions and ideas and recommendations. A great number of them we've acted on, many of which we won't act on. And I think he's seen the priority that we've taken in terms of the things we will act on in terms of the structural changes around Shared Health, which he's had questions about already this afternoon.
      And those have been the priority for the government. We won't act on every recommendation. I don't really intend to go through, you know, recommendation by recommendation other than to say we got a lot of recommendations, we've acted on many of them, so you've already seen what–our priorities.
      I think you could look to the history of this government in terms of supporting newborn hearing. In fact, I had the opportunity not too long ago to celebrate with a very young Manitoban who was the youngest Manitoban to ever receive a cochlear implant. Her name was Ireland and–her name is Ireland. And it was quite something to interact with the parents and see the video of when she first was able to hear. And I think that that's a demonstration of our support for newborn hearing and hearing in general.
      And certainly, when it comes to the KPMG report, as helpful as it was in terms of looking at us compared to other provinces, we won't accept every recommendation within the report


Popular posts from this blog

Dougald Lamont speaks at Meth Forum last night to present positive ideas to address the epidemic, while exposing the lack of action by the Pallister Conservatives

Last night at the Notre Dame Recreation Centre in St. Boniface, at an Election Forum on the Meth Crisis in Manitoba, Dougald Lamont spoke eloquently about the severity of the meth epidemic and described the Liberal plan to address it.  The Liberal Plan will make sure that there is a single province-wide phone number for people, or friends of people, who need help dealing with meth to call (as there is in Alberta) and that there will be rapid access to a seamless series of steps - stabilization, detoxification, treatment, extended supportive housing etc so that people with meth addiction can be helped well and effectively and so that they can rebuild their lives.  The Liberal meth plan will be helped by our approach to mental health (putting psychological therapies under medicare), and to poverty (providing better support).  It will also be helped by our vigorous efforts to help young people understand the problems with meth in our education system and to provide alternative positive

Manitoba Liberal accomplishments

  Examples of Manitoba Liberal accomplishments in the last three years Ensured that 2,000 Manitoba fishers were able to earn a living in 2020   (To see the full story click on this link ). Introduced a bill that includes retired teachers on the Pension Investment Board which governs their pension investments. Introduced amendments to ensure school aged children are included in childcare and early childhood education plans moving forward. Called for improvements in the management of the COVID pandemic: ·          We called for attention to personal care homes even before there was a single case in a personal care home. ·            We called for a rapid response team to address outbreaks in personal care homes months before the PCs acted.  ·          We called for a science-based approach to preparing schools to   improve ventilation and humidity long before the PCs acted. Helped hundreds of individuals with issues during the pandemic including those on social assistance

Comparison between Manitoba and South Dakota shows dramatic impact of Physical Distancing

Manitoba implemented physical distancing measures in mid-March.  South Dakota has still not made physical distancing mandatory.   The result is a dramatic difference in the incidence of covid-19 viral infections between the two jurisdictions.   This graph shows the number of people with Covid-19 infections from March 27 to April 14.  Manitoba ( red line )  started leveling off about April 4 and has seen only a small increase in Covid-19 infections since then.   South Dakota ( blue line )   has seen a dramatic increase in Covid-19 infections since April 4.  Those who are skeptical of the impact of physical distancing in Manitoba should look at this graph! Data are from the Johns Hopkins daily tabulations